CrPC-1898-Batch-7-MEGA-ALL-MCQs judiciary
300 questions
-
Question 1 of 300
Under Section 4(1)(k), an 'inquiry' under the Code means:
ExplanationSection 4(1)(k) draws a precise distinction: 'inquiry' is every proceeding other than a trial conducted under the Code by a Magistrate or Court.
-
Question 2 of 300
Under Section 417(2)-(3), a private complainant may appeal an acquittal only with the High Court's special leave, sought within how many days of the acquittal order?
ExplanationSection 417(2)-(3) gives a private complainant a narrower route than the government: special leave to appeal must be sought within sixty days, and if leave is refused, no further appeal under this section is available.
-
Question 3 of 300
Under Section 9(1), a Court of Session is established by the Provincial Government for every:
ExplanationSection 9(1) requires the Provincial Government to establish a Court of Session for every sessions division, with a Judge appointed to preside over it.
-
Question 4 of 300
Under Section 40, if a person invested with Code powers in a local area is appointed to an equal or higher office of the same nature within a similar local area, he shall (unless otherwise directed) continue to exercise:
ExplanationSection 40 avoids a bureaucratic gap: powers already conferred on an officer generally carry over automatically to an equivalent or higher post of the same nature, absent a contrary direction.
-
Question 5 of 300
Under Section 402, the power to commute a sentence to any less severe form of punishment lies with:
ExplanationSection 402 gives the Government the power to commute a sentence to a lesser form of punishment — distinct from an appellate court altering a sentence, and separate from Presidential clemency under Article 45 of the Constitution.
-
Question 6 of 300
Pakistani courts have observed that Section 540 is structured in two parts: the first giving the Court a discretionary power to summon witnesses, while the second part — requiring the Court to summon a witness whose evidence appears essential to the just decision of the case — is:
ExplanationCourts (drawing on Jamatraj Kewalji Govani's reasoning) have distinguished Section 540's two limbs: the general power to summon any witness is discretionary, but once evidence genuinely appears essential to a just decision, the Court's duty to summon or recall that witness becomes mandatory, not optional.
-
Question 7 of 300
Under Section 426, as interpreted by superior courts, a person sentenced to life imprisonment ordinarily becomes entitled to bail if the appeal is not decided within how many years of conviction?
ExplanationSection 426(1-A), as applied by Pakistani courts (e.g., Bahadar v. State, 1997 SCMR 1183), creates an ordinary entitlement to bail if a life-sentence appeal remains undecided after two years, absent recorded reasons to the contrary.
-
Question 8 of 300
Under Section 340, a person against whom proceedings are instituted under the Code is entitled to be defended by a pleader, and is himself:
ExplanationSection 340 combines two rights: representation by a pleader, and — importantly — the accused's own competency to testify as a defence witness, though (consistent with the privilege against self-incrimination) he cannot be compelled to do so.
-
Question 9 of 300
Under Section 29-B, an offence (other than one punishable with death or life imprisonment) committed by a person under what age at the time of appearing before Court may be tried by a specially empowered Magistrate under juvenile procedure?
ExplanationSection 29-B sets the relevant age threshold at fifteen years — below which a non-capital, non-life-imprisonment offence may be tried under special juvenile procedure rather than ordinary criminal trial.
-
Question 10 of 300
Under Section 203, a Magistrate may dismiss a complaint if, after considering the complainant's statement and any Section 202 inquiry result, he finds:
ExplanationSection 203 empowers dismissal where, having weighed the statements and any inquiry/investigation, the Magistrate concludes there is insufficient ground to proceed — but he must record his reasons briefly.
-
Question 11 of 300
Under Section 4(1)(f), a 'cognizable offence' is one in which a police officer may, per the Second Schedule or other law:
ExplanationSection 4(1)(f) defines 'cognizable' by the police officer's power to arrest without a warrant — the core distinction from 'non-cognizable' offences.
-
Question 12 of 300
Under Section 98(1), as amended, the specialised search-warrant power for a Magistrate of the First Class extends to places used for the deposit or sale of stolen property, forged documents, counterfeit currency, and (added by later amendment):
ExplanationSection 98(1) was later expanded to cover places used for the deposit, sale, manufacture, or production of obscene objects under Section 292 of the Pakistan Penal Code, alongside its original stolen-property and forgery/counterfeiting scope.
-
Question 13 of 300
Under Section 511, a previous conviction or acquittal may be proved, in addition to other methods, by production of:
ExplanationSection 511 provides a formal documentary method for proving prior convictions/acquittals via an official custodian's certificate, avoiding the need to fully relitigate the earlier proceeding's facts each time such history becomes relevant.
-
Question 14 of 300
Section 402-A specifically addresses:
ExplanationSection 402-A carves out death sentences for special treatment within the broader suspension/remission/commutation framework, reflecting the unique gravity and finality of capital punishment decisions.
-
Question 15 of 300
Under Section 55(1)(b), an officer in charge of a police station may arrest a person found within station limits who has no ostensible means of subsistence, or who:
ExplanationSection 55(1)(b) is the classic 'vagrancy' arrest power — targeting persons with no visible means of subsistence or who cannot satisfactorily explain their presence/circumstances, alongside 55(1)(a) (suspicious concealment) and 55(1)(c) (habitual offenders by repute).
-
Question 16 of 300
The Supreme Court (Ali Gohar v. Pervaiz Ahmed, PLD 2020 SC 427) clarified that the Section 561-A remedy:
ExplanationThis confirms that Section 561-A's broad inherent jurisdiction is not meant to bypass the specific procedural remedies the Code already provides — a litigant cannot simply choose 561-A over the ordinary revision or early-acquittal routes when those routes are the ones actually designed for the situation.
-
Question 17 of 300
Under Section 32(1), a Magistrate of the First Class may impose a maximum term of imprisonment of:
ExplanationSection 32(1)(a) sets the First Class Magistrate's ceiling at three years' imprisonment, with a fine not exceeding forty-five thousand rupees.
-
Question 18 of 300
Pakistani case law confirms that mere silence of an accused, or his failure to make a statement on oath, does NOT by itself:
ExplanationThe Supreme Court (Amir Khatun v. Faiz Ahmed, PLD 1991 SC 787) held that an accused cannot be compelled to make a sworn statement, and that no adverse inference may be drawn purely from his choosing not to — consistent with the privilege against self-incrimination running throughout the Code.
-
Question 19 of 300
Under Section 91, when a person for whose appearance a summons or warrant could be issued is present in Court, the officer may instead simply require him to execute:
ExplanationSection 91 offers a streamlined alternative to formal summons/warrant machinery when the person is already present — a simple bond for future appearance, sparing the need for further formal process.
-
Question 20 of 300
Under Section 68(1), every summons issued by a Court must be in writing, in duplicate, and:
ExplanationSection 68(1) sets the formal execution requirements for a valid summons: written, duplicate, and signed/sealed by the appropriate court officer.
-
Question 21 of 300
Pakistani superior courts have held that a Section 173 report's conclusions must be based on:
ExplanationThe Sindh High Court has clarified that an investigating officer is not bound to adopt either the informant's or the defence's narrative — the Section 173 report must reflect the actual facts genuinely discovered during investigation.
-
Question 22 of 300
Under Section 32(1), a Magistrate of the Third Class may impose a maximum term of imprisonment of:
ExplanationSection 32(1)(c) caps a Third Class Magistrate's imprisonment power at one month, alongside a fine not exceeding three thousand rupees — the lowest tier of magisterial sentencing power.
-
Question 23 of 300
Under Section 249-A, a Magistrate has the power to acquit an accused at any stage of a case if, for reasons to be recorded, he considers the charge to be:
ExplanationSection 249-A gives a Magistrate an efficiency-oriented early-exit power — acquitting at any stage upon finding the charge groundless or conviction improbable — rather than mandating that every trial run its full course.
-
Question 24 of 300
Under Section 4(1)(h), a 'complaint' under the Code is an allegation made to a Magistrate that a person has committed an offence, but expressly EXCLUDES:
ExplanationSection 4(1)(h) defines 'complaint' broadly (oral or written, known or unknown accused) but specifically excludes a police officer's report — which is instead governed by Section 173.
-
Question 25 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that security proceedings under Section 107 fall outside the scope of Section 250, meaning:
ExplanationThe Supreme Court (Ghulam Qadir v. Fazal Din, PLD 1962 SC 331) held that Section 250's compensation-for-false-accusation mechanism does not apply to Section 107 security proceedings — the two provisions serve different, non-overlapping purposes.
-
Question 26 of 300
Under Section 76, a Court issuing an arrest warrant may direct, by endorsement, that the person be released on executing a bond with sufficient sureties — this endorsement must state the number of sureties, the amount they and the arrestee are bound in, and:
ExplanationSection 76(2) requires the endorsement to specify three things: number of sureties, the bound amount, and the specific time for the arrestee's court attendance.
-
Question 27 of 300
Under Section 368 (as it appears in the Judgment chapter), where the accused is convicted, the judgment must specify the offence and the section of the law under which he is convicted, and:
ExplanationA convicting judgment must clearly state both the specific offence/section of conviction and the actual sentence imposed — leaving no ambiguity about what the accused has been found guilty of and what punishment follows.
-
Question 28 of 300
Under Section 245, if upon taking all the evidence the Magistrate finds the accused not guilty, he shall record an order of:
ExplanationSection 245 requires a formal acquittal (not a mere discharge) where the evidence, once fully taken, fails to establish guilt — a legally final and more protective outcome than discharge.
-
Question 29 of 300
Section 540 empowers a Court, at any stage of an inquiry, trial or other proceeding, to summon any person as a witness, or examine any person in attendance, if his evidence appears to be:
ExplanationSection 540 gives the Court an independent, party-neutral power to call or recall witnesses whose evidence is genuinely essential to a just decision — reflecting the Court's own duty to seek the truth, not merely referee the parties' presentations.
-
Question 30 of 300
Under the Explanation to Section 164, it is necessary that the Magistrate recording a confession or statement:
ExplanationSection 164's Explanation expressly removes any jurisdictional requirement — any Magistrate of the first class (or specially empowered second class Magistrate) may record the statement, whether or not he has jurisdiction over the underlying case.
-
Question 31 of 300
Section 260 empowers certain Magistrates to try specified offences summarily, meaning:
ExplanationSection 260 authorises summary trial — a streamlined procedure — for specified categories of relatively minor or straightforward offences, reducing the time and formality of an ordinary trial.
-
Question 32 of 300
Under Section 88(7), if the proclaimed person does not appear, attached property goes to the disposal of the Provincial Government but shall not be sold until the expiration of how many months from attachment (absent perishability)?
ExplanationSection 88(7) protects the absconder's property interest with a six-month waiting period before sale, unless the property is perishable or the Court finds sale would benefit the owner.
-
Question 33 of 300
Under Section 243, if the accused admits the truth of the accusation as read out to him, the Magistrate shall record the admission and:
ExplanationSection 243 allows a Magistrate to convict on a genuine admission of guilt, though this remains discretionary rather than mandatory — the Magistrate must still be satisfied the admission is voluntary and unambiguous.
-
Question 34 of 300
Section 96 empowers a Court to issue a search warrant when it believes a person will not produce a summoned document, when the document's possessor is unknown, or when:
ExplanationSection 96 gives the Court three independent triggers for issuing a search warrant, the third being a general finding that search/inspection would serve the proceeding's purposes.
-
Question 35 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that where there is a discrepancy in a material part of a principal witness's evidence between the vernacular record and an English record of the same testimony:
ExplanationBecause vernacular recording generally captures a witness's actual testimony more faithfully, a material discrepancy against an English record has been held to genuinely benefit the accused — reflecting the broader principle that ambiguity in the evidentiary record should not be resolved against him.
-
Question 36 of 300
Under Section 517, when an inquiry or trial concludes, the Court may make such order as it thinks fit for the disposal of any property produced before it, including delivery to the person entitled to possession, or, where such person cannot be ascertained:
ExplanationSection 517 gives the Court broad, case-appropriate discretion over property disposal at the conclusion of proceedings, extending beyond simple return-to-owner to cover situations where ownership is unclear or the property itself warrants destruction or confiscation.
-
Question 37 of 300
Section 197 requires prior sanction before prosecuting which category of persons for acts done in the discharge of official duties?
ExplanationSection 197 protects Judges and certain public servants from prosecution for official-duty acts unless the appropriate government first sanctions the prosecution — a safeguard against harassment litigation targeting officials.
-
Question 38 of 300
Under Section 51, when a person arrested cannot furnish bail (or is not legally entitled to it), the arresting officer may search him and place in safe custody all articles found on him, EXCEPT:
ExplanationSection 51 permits a search-and-seizure of an arrested person's belongings, but expressly exempts necessary wearing apparel from being taken into custody.
-
Question 39 of 300
Under Section 202, before issuing process on a complaint, a Magistrate may postpone the issue of process and either inquire into the case himself, or direct an investigation to be made by:
ExplanationSection 202 gives the Magistrate discretion to postpone process and order further inquiry or investigation — by police or another suitable person — to test the complaint's substance before summoning the accused.
-
Question 40 of 300
Under Section 60, a police officer making a warrantless arrest must, without unnecessary delay, take or send the person arrested before:
ExplanationSection 60 requires prompt production before either a competent Magistrate or a police station house officer — the first procedural checkpoint after a warrantless arrest, feeding into the 24-hour rule under Section 61.
-
Question 41 of 300
The Supreme Court (State v. Abdul Rehman, 2005 SCMR 1544) clarified that Sections 249-A, 265-K, and 561-A:
ExplanationThis ruling places an important limit on the seemingly broad 249-A/265-K/561-A powers — ordinary criminal cases should generally run their full course (evidence, Section 342 examination, arguments) rather than being routinely short-circuited, with early acquittal reserved for genuinely clear-cut cases.
-
Question 42 of 300
Under Section 154, information relating to a cognizable offence given orally to an officer in charge of a police station must be:
ExplanationSection 154 is the FIR provision: oral cognizable-offence information must be reduced to writing, read back to the informant, signed by him, and logged in the prescribed register — registration is mandatory, not discretionary, regardless of the information's apparent truth.
-
Question 43 of 300
Under Section 35(2)(a), when a person is convicted of several offences at one trial and given consecutive sentences, in no case shall the aggregate imprisonment exceed:
ExplanationSection 35(2)(a) caps aggregate consecutive imprisonment for multiple offences tried together at fourteen years, regardless of how the individual sentences add up.
-
Question 44 of 300
Under Section 265-C, before framing of charge, the prosecution must furnish the accused with copies of the police report, the FIR, statements of prosecution witnesses, and other relevant documents. Pakistani superior courts have held this requirement to be:
ExplanationPakistani case law (e.g., as reflected in Prosecutor General Punjab's compiled precedents) treats non-compliance with specific parts of Section 265-C as potentially fatal to the trial, reinforcing that fair-trial disclosure is a substantive right, not a mere formality — echoing the same principle Section 241-A applies at the Magistrate level.
-
Question 45 of 300
Under Section 224, words used in describing an offence in a charge are deemed to be used in the sense attached to them respectively by:
ExplanationSection 224 ties the legal meaning of charge language to the specific statute creating the offence, ensuring technical terms carry their precise statutory meaning rather than a loose colloquial one.
-
Question 46 of 300
Pakistani courts have clarified that general remissions announced by the Government on occasions like Independence Day or Eid (under Sections 401/402) are legally distinct from Presidential remissions, in that the former derive from:
ExplanationThe Sindh High Court clarified that routine occasion-based general remissions are a creature of statutory CrPC power (Sections 401/402) and prison rules, distinct from — and sometimes wrongly conflated with — the President's own separate constitutional remission power under Article 45.
-
Question 47 of 300
The Supreme Court has clarified (Model Custom Collectorate Islamabad v. Aamir Mumtaz Qureshi, 2022 SCMR 1861) that Sections 249-A/265-K may NOT be invoked where there is:
ExplanationThe Supreme Court held that even a remote — not merely a strong — probability of conviction is enough to bar early acquittal under these sections; each case must be judged on its own facts, with courts required to actually record their reasons rather than simply asserting the charge is groundless.
-
Question 48 of 300
Under Section 123, failure to give security ordered under this Chapter results in imprisonment, and proceedings involving certain categories must be laid before the High Court or Court of Session, with the type of imprisonment being:
ExplanationSection 123 addresses consequences for failing to furnish ordered security, channeling certain cases to higher judicial review and specifying the imprisonment as simple in character.
-
Question 49 of 300
Under the proviso to Section 421(1), an appeal presented under Section 419 shall NOT be dismissed summarily unless:
ExplanationSection 421(1)'s proviso ensures that even a summary dismissal — meant to filter out clearly meritless appeals quickly — cannot happen without first giving the appellant (or his pleader) a genuine chance to argue the appeal's merits.
-
Question 50 of 300
Under Section 265-K, the Court has the power to acquit the accused at any stage of a case if, for reasons to be recorded, it considers there is:
ExplanationSection 265-K mirrors Section 249-A's Magistrate-level power at the Sessions/High Court level — allowing an efficiency-oriented early acquittal where continuing the trial would serve no purpose.
-
Question 51 of 300
Pakistani case law has established a foundational principle that when a Magistrate takes cognizance under Section 190(1)(b) on a police report, he takes cognizance of:
ExplanationThis is a foundational, frequently-tested principle: cognizance attaches to the offence as a matter of law, meaning the Magistrate can issue process against other persons who appear concerned in that same offence, even if the police report itself did not name them.
-
Question 52 of 300
Pakistani case law has clarified that Section 540 cannot properly be used:
ExplanationWhile Section 540 gives courts wide truth-seeking power, Pakistani courts have cautioned it is not meant to rescue a prosecution that has simply failed to prove its case — it exists to serve the just decision of the case, not to patch over evidentiary gaps a party should itself have filled.
-
Question 53 of 300
Under Section 497(5), a person released on bail under this section may later be arrested and recommitted to custody by:
ExplanationSection 497(5) allows bail to be revoked and the person recommitted to custody by a High Court or Sessions Court generally, or by the specific court that granted the release in the first place.
-
Question 54 of 300
Under Section 356, in trials before a Court of Session (and other cases falling outside Section 355), the evidence of each witness must be taken down:
ExplanationSection 356 requires fuller, narrative-style evidence recording than the memorandum approach in Section 355 — reflecting the greater seriousness and complexity of Sessions Court proceedings.
-
Question 55 of 300
Pakistani case law distinguishes an actual acquittal from a mere refusal to take cognizance, holding that:
ExplanationThe Supreme Court (Rana Muhammad Afzal Khan, PLD 1962 SC 397) clarified that Section 403's double-jeopardy bar requires a genuine acquittal on the facts — a court's mere refusal to take cognizance of a charge (for a separate legal reason) does not count as an acquittal and does not block a later trial.
-
Question 56 of 300
Section 361 requires that where evidence is recorded in a language the accused does not understand, it must be:
ExplanationSection 361 safeguards a non-native-language-speaking accused's ability to follow the proceedings by requiring interpretation of the recorded evidence into a language he understands.
-
Question 57 of 300
Under Section 87(1), a proclamation for a person absconding must require him to appear at a specified place and time not less than how many days from the date of publishing the proclamation?
ExplanationSection 87(1) requires the proclamation to give the absconder at least thirty days' notice before the specified appearance deadline.
-
Question 58 of 300
Under Section 30, notwithstanding Sections 28 and 29, the Provincial Government may invest a Magistrate of the First Class with power to try, as a Magistrate, all offences:
ExplanationSection 30 lets the Provincial Government expand a First Class Magistrate's trial jurisdiction beyond the ordinary Second Schedule allocation, but expressly excludes offences punishable with death — capital cases remain outside this expanded power.
-
Question 59 of 300
Under Section 496, in a bailable offence, an accused person appearing or brought before a court, or arrested/detained without warrant:
ExplanationSection 496 establishes bail as an entitlement (not a discretionary favour) in bailable offences — a sharp contrast with Section 497's non-bailable offence framework, where bail is a concession rather than a right.
-
Question 60 of 300
Under Section 99-B, a person with an interest in forfeited material may apply to the High Court to set aside the forfeiture order within how many months of the order?
ExplanationSection 99-B gives an affected party a two-month window to challenge a Section 99-A forfeiture order before the High Court, arguing the material did not actually contain the objectionable matter alleged.
-
Question 61 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that where an accused's Section 342 statement is not signed or thumb-marked in accordance with the mandatory requirements of Section 364, this defect is:
ExplanationBecause Section 364's signing/attestation requirements are treated as mandatory, not merely directory, non-compliance has been held to be a genuine illegality — not a curable irregularity — requiring the accused's statement to be properly re-recorded.
-
Question 62 of 300
Under Section 265-A, trials before a Court of Session are to be conducted by:
ExplanationSection 265-A requires Sessions trials to be conducted by Public Prosecutors — reflecting the state's central role in prosecuting serious offences triable exclusively by the Sessions Court.
-
Question 63 of 300
Under Section 265-D, the trial court's function at the pre-charge stage is to form an opinion, based on the police report and accompanying material, as to whether:
ExplanationSection 265-D requires a genuine judicial screening function — assessing whether sufficient grounds exist to proceed to trial — rather than a rubber-stamp acceptance of whatever the police have submitted in the challan.
-
Question 64 of 300
Pakistani case law has clarified that once a Magistrate has personally examined the complainant under Section 200 and recorded witness evidence under Section 202, he:
ExplanationOnce a Magistrate has already personally taken the complainant's sworn statement and witness evidence, Pakistani courts have held he should carry the matter through to trial himself rather than belatedly outsourcing it to a police investigation at that stage.
-
Question 65 of 300
Under Section 466, an accused found incapable of making his defence due to unsoundness of mind may be released, pending investigation or trial, upon:
ExplanationSection 466 provides a conditional-release mechanism distinct from ordinary bail — focused on care and harm-prevention rather than simply securing court appearance, reflecting the different nature of the concern in unsoundness-of-mind cases.
-
Question 66 of 300
Under Section 345, certain offences under the Pakistan Penal Code may be compounded (settled) by the parties, in some cases requiring:
ExplanationSection 345 lists compoundable offences in a table — some compoundable freely between the parties, others only with the Court's permission — and the effect of a valid composition is acquittal of the accused.
-
Question 67 of 300
Under Section 46(1), in making an arrest, the police officer or person making it must:
ExplanationSection 46(1) requires actual physical touch or confinement to effect arrest, unless the person submits to custody by word or action — a foundational definition of what 'arrest' legally means.
-
Question 68 of 300
Under Section 464, when a Magistrate holding an inquiry or trial has reason to believe the accused is of unsound mind and incapable of making his defence, the Magistrate must have him examined by:
ExplanationSection 464 channels the mental-capacity assessment specifically to the Civil Surgeon or a government-directed medical officer, ensuring an independent, officially credentialed examination rather than a privately arranged one.
-
Question 69 of 300
Under Section 36, the powers every Magistrate ordinarily holds — their 'ordinary powers' — are specified in the:
ExplanationSection 36 refers to the Third Schedule for a Magistrate's 'ordinary powers'; the Fourth Schedule (Section 37) lists additional powers the High Court may recommend conferring.
-
Question 70 of 300
Under Section 145(1), before making an order, the Magistrate must be satisfied from a police report or other information that a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace exists, and must then require the parties to attend and:
ExplanationSection 145(1)'s verbatim text requires written statements specifically addressing actual possession — not title or ownership — consistent with the section's deliberate limitation to a possession-only inquiry.
-
Question 71 of 300
Under Section 99-A, the power to declare a newspaper, book, or document forfeited to Government for containing seditious or treasonable matter belongs to the:
ExplanationSection 99-A vests this forfeiture power in the Provincial Government itself (not a court), which must publish a Gazette notification stating its grounds — after which any police officer may seize the material and a Magistrate may authorise search for further copies.
-
Question 72 of 300
Under Section 69, if practicable, a summons must be served:
ExplanationSection 69 sets personal service as the default, preferred method — other modes (substituted service, service on an agent, etc.) are fallback options used only when personal service genuinely cannot be achieved.
-
Question 73 of 300
Pakistani case law confirms that the President's power under Article 45 of the Constitution to commute a sentence is:
ExplanationThe Supreme Court (Bhai Khan, PLD 1992 SC 14) held that the President's Article 45 commutation power stands unrestricted — a notably broader authority than the Government's own statutory commutation power under Sections 401-402 of the CrPC, which is subject to specific procedural conditions.
-
Question 74 of 300
Section 435 empowers certain courts to call for and examine the record of any proceeding before an inferior criminal court, for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the:
ExplanationSection 435 is the foundation of the revisional jurisdiction — a supervisory check on the correctness, legality, and propriety of decisions from courts below, exercised on the calling court's own initiative or upon application.
-
Question 75 of 300
Section 133 empowers a Magistrate to make a conditional order for the removal of a nuisance arising from an unlawful obstruction, or from a trade/occupation injurious to health, upon receiving a police report or:
ExplanationSection 133 gives a Magistrate broad evidentiary latitude — police report or other information, plus whatever evidence he considers appropriate — to issue a conditional nuisance-removal order.
-
Question 76 of 300
Section 49 permits a police officer or authorised person to break open doors or windows for the purpose of:
ExplanationSection 49 is a self-liberation provision — distinct from Section 48's initial-entry powers — addressing the scenario where someone who lawfully entered to arrest becomes trapped or confined and must break out.
-
Question 77 of 300
Under Section 205, a Magistrate issuing a summons may, if he sees reason to do so, dispense with the personal attendance of the accused and permit him to appear by:
ExplanationSection 205 allows representation through a pleader instead of mandatory personal attendance, reducing unnecessary hardship in appropriate cases while preserving the accused's right to a defence.
-
Question 78 of 300
Under Section 427, in an appeal from an order of acquittal, the High Court may:
ExplanationSection 427 gives the High Court the power to arrest and detain (or admit to bail) an acquitted accused during the pendency of the State's or complainant's appeal against that acquittal.
-
Question 79 of 300
Under Section 100, if a Magistrate of the First Class believes a person is confined in circumstances amounting to an offence, he may issue a search warrant, and the confined person, if found, shall be:
ExplanationSection 100 requires the rescued person to be brought promptly before a Magistrate, who then makes whatever order the circumstances require — not an automatic unconditional release.
-
Question 80 of 300
Under Section 25, Judges of the High Court are, by virtue of their office, Justices of the Peace for:
ExplanationSection 25 makes High Court Judges ex-officio Justices of the Peace for the whole of Pakistan, reflecting the seniority of that office.
-
Question 81 of 300
Under Section 176, in addition to the police inquiry under Section 174, a Magistrate may hold his own inquiry into the cause of death, and for this purpose has the power to:
ExplanationSection 176 gives the Magistrate an independent inquest power, including the striking authority to order disinterment of a body already buried, to properly investigate the cause of death.
-
Question 82 of 300
Under Section 161, a police officer investigating a case may orally examine any person acquainted with the facts, and such person is bound to:
ExplanationSection 161 obliges witnesses to answer truthfully, with a built-in self-incrimination exception — the statement recorded under this section is what Section 162 then restricts from being signed or freely used as substantive evidence.
-
Question 83 of 300
Under Section 522, where a person is convicted of cheating, forgery, or an offence attended by criminal force/intimidation resulting in dispossession of immovable property, the Court may order restoration of possession within:
ExplanationSection 522 gives the Court a one-month window from conviction to order restoration of possession — and this restoration order applies whether the property remains with the convicted person or has since been transferred to someone else.
-
Question 84 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that a person questioned by police under Section 161 is:
ExplanationPakistani case law (Kassim Khan v. Emperor) confirms that a Section 161 statement is neither made on oath nor signed — accordingly, a person who later resiles from it cannot be prosecuted for perjury (or even under Section 182 PPC for a false statement) over what he told police, sharply distinguishing it from a Section 164 statement made on oath before a Magistrate.
-
Question 85 of 300
The Supreme Court (M.S. Khawaja, PLD 1965 SC 587) established that the core test in a Section 561-A quashment proceeding is:
ExplanationThis 'abuse of process' test is the foundational standard for Section 561-A quashment — the Court asks not whether it personally disagrees with the prosecution, but whether letting the proceedings continue would itself amount to an abuse of the judicial process.
-
Question 86 of 300
The Supreme Court (Arshad Zubair, 1993 SCMR 2059) held that when a Magistrate conducts a search in his own presence under Section 105 rather than issuing a formal search warrant, the safeguards of:
ExplanationEven though Section 105 lets a Magistrate personally direct a search without issuing a separate formal warrant, the Supreme Court confirmed this does not exempt the search from Section 103's witness safeguards — since it remains a search under Chapter VII, the same procedural protections apply.
-
Question 87 of 300
Where a Station House Officer refuses to register an FIR for a cognizable offence, the primary Pakistani remedy — before resorting to a constitutional writ petition — is an application to the:
ExplanationSections 22-A and 22-B give the Justice of the Peace (typically the Sessions Judge or a designated Additional Sessions Judge) power to direct registration of a case when police wrongfully refuse — Pakistani superior courts have repeatedly confirmed this as the appropriate first-line remedy, ahead of an Article 199 constitutional writ petition.
-
Question 88 of 300
Under Section 401, the power to suspend or remit a sentence, in whole or part, and either unconditionally or upon conditions, is vested in:
ExplanationSection 401 vests suspension/remission power in the appropriate Government (Provincial or Federal depending on the matter), separate from the judicial appeal or confirmation process.
-
Question 89 of 300
Under the proviso to Section 94(1), no police officer may order production of documents in a bank's custody relating to a bank account except with prior written permission of a Sessions Judge (for specified PPC offences) or, in other cases, of:
ExplanationSection 94(1)'s proviso protects banking confidentiality: bank-account-related document orders require Sessions Judge permission for specified serious offences, or High Court permission in all other cases.
-
Question 90 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that where no proceedings under Sections 87 and 88 (proclamation and attachment) have actually been taken against an accused, his bail:
ExplanationThe Supreme Court (Khan Mir v. Amal Sharin, 1989 SCMR 1987) held that an unsubstantiated allegation of abscondence — without the formal Section 87/88 proclamation and attachment process actually having been invoked — is not itself sufficient ground to cancel bail.
-
Question 91 of 300
Under Section 379, procedure in cases submitted to the High Court for confirmation of a death sentence requires the case to be heard by a Bench of:
ExplanationSection 379 mandates a multi-Judge Bench (at least two) for death-sentence confirmation hearings, reflecting the gravity of the decision and the importance of collective judicial scrutiny before a capital sentence is finalised.
-
Question 92 of 300
Pakistani courts have held that where a challan is filed far beyond the Section 173(1)(b) timeline while the accused remains in custody throughout, the consequence can be that:
ExplanationIn a case where a challan was filed 34 days after arrest — well beyond the 14+3 day statutory window — the appellate court held this was a clear Section 173(1)(b) violation that rendered the custody unlawful throughout, vitiating the entire proceedings.
-
Question 93 of 300
Under Section 75(2), a warrant of arrest remains in force until:
ExplanationSection 75(2) gives an arrest warrant indefinite validity — it stays in force until either cancelled by the Court that issued it, or executed, with no automatic expiry.
-
Question 94 of 300
Under Section 439, in exercising its revisional powers, the High Court may exercise any of the powers conferred on a Court of Appeal, and may additionally:
ExplanationSection 439 gives the High Court's revisional jurisdiction a distinctive extra power beyond ordinary appellate powers — the ability to enhance a sentence, subject to giving the accused an opportunity to be heard under Section 439(2).
-
Question 95 of 300
Pakistani case law draws a key contrast between appellate and revisional powers: in an appeal, a sentence cannot typically be enhanced by the same route that would let an acquittal be reversed into a conviction, whereas in revision:
ExplanationCrown v. Sultan Mahmood (PLD 1955 FC 20) crystallized this asymmetry: revisional powers permit sentence enhancement but not converting an acquittal into a conviction, while appellate powers work differently — a frequently tested contrast for judicial exams.
-
Question 96 of 300
Pakistani case law establishes that a First Information Report (FIR) is treated at trial as:
ExplanationPakistani superior courts have consistently held that an FIR is not substantive evidence of the facts it narrates — its evidentiary use is limited to corroborating or contradicting the person who lodged it, similar in spirit to the limited use of Section 161 statements.
-
Question 97 of 300
Under Section 58, a police officer authorised to arrest a person without warrant may, for that purpose, pursue such person:
ExplanationSection 58 gives warrantless-arrest pursuit power nationwide reach — the officer isn't confined to his home jurisdiction once lawfully pursuing a person he's authorised to arrest.
-
Question 98 of 300
Pakistani courts have held that where police investigate a non-cognizable case without the Magistrate's prior permission required by Section 155(2), the investigation is:
ExplanationPakistani case law treats the Section 155(2) permission requirement as a genuine jurisdictional prerequisite, not a mere formality — investigating a non-cognizable case without it has led courts to quash the resulting proceedings entirely.
-
Question 99 of 300
Section 561-A preserves the inherent power of the High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under the Code, prevent abuse of the process of any Court, or otherwise:
ExplanationSection 561-A is the celebrated 'inherent powers' provision — frequently invoked to quash FIRs or criminal proceedings that would otherwise amount to an abuse of process, precisely because rigid statutory procedure cannot anticipate every situation justice may require addressing.
-
Question 100 of 300
Unlike Section 529's curable irregularities, Section 530 lists categories of irregularity that:
ExplanationSection 530 is the mirror image of Section 529 — proceedings falling into its listed categories (such as certain jurisdictional defects) are treated as vitiated outright, without needing to separately prove actual prejudice to the accused.
-
Question 101 of 300
Under Section 6(1), the Code's two classes of Criminal Court exist in addition to:
ExplanationSection 6(1) clarifies that Sessions Courts and Magistrates' Courts sit alongside — not replace — the High Courts and any other courts separately constituted by other laws.
-
Question 102 of 300
Under Section 193, a Court of Session cannot take cognizance of an offence as a court of original jurisdiction unless the case has been:
ExplanationSection 193 embodies the committal principle: a Sessions Court's original jurisdiction is triggered only through a Magistrate's committal, not by direct complaint or police report to the Sessions Court itself.
-
Question 103 of 300
Under Section 78(1), a Magistrate of the First Class may direct a warrant to a landholder, farmer, or land manager for the arrest of an escaped convict, proclaimed offender, or person accused of a non-bailable offence, specifically where that person has:
ExplanationSection 78(1) is a distinctive rural-enforcement provision: it deputizes landholders/farmers/managers specifically for cases where an escaped convict, proclaimed offender, or non-bailable-offence accused has eluded ordinary police pursuit.
-
Question 104 of 300
Pakistani courts have clarified that the phrase 'at any stage' in Section 265-K (and its Magistrate-level counterpart, Section 249-A) means the power to acquit:
ExplanationPakistani superior court rulings confirm that 'at any stage' genuinely means what it says — the Court may acquit even before evidence is recorded or a charge is framed, provided it can already see the prosecution's case is groundless — though this discretion must be exercised judicially, not to deny the prosecution a fair opportunity to present its case.
-
Question 105 of 300
Under the first proviso to Section 497(1), even for offences within the prohibitory clause, the Court may direct release on bail of a person under sixteen years of age, or any woman, or:
ExplanationThe first proviso to Section 497(1) creates a special concession for three categories — minors under sixteen, women, and sick/infirm persons — even where the offence would otherwise fall within the prohibitory (no-bail) clause. The Supreme Court has held this concession applies as a rule, with refusal being the exception, absent exceptional circumstances.
-
Question 106 of 300
Under Section 146, if the Magistrate in a Section 145 dispute finds no party in possession, or is unable to determine possession, he may:
ExplanationSection 146 provides the fallback where possession genuinely cannot be determined: attachment of the disputed property pending a competent court's resolution of the underlying rights, rather than an arbitrary award to either party.
-
Question 107 of 300
Under Section 17(1), Magistrates appointed under Sections 12, 13 and 14, and Benches under Section 15, are subordinate to the:
ExplanationSection 17(1) places (Judicial) Magistrates and Magistrate Benches under the administrative subordination of the Sessions Judge, who may issue rules or special orders on the distribution of business among them.
-
Question 108 of 300
Pakistani case law holds that where an accused person himself lodges the FIR admitting to the offence, that FIR is:
ExplanationBecause an FIR is not recorded with the safeguards that make a Section 164 confession reliable, Pakistani courts exclude a self-incriminating FIR lodged by the accused himself from consideration at trial, on the same rationale that protects against unreliable, unsafeguarded confessions.
-
Question 109 of 300
Under Section 155, for a non-cognizable offence, a police officer:
ExplanationSection 155 requires Magisterial authorisation before police may investigate a non-cognizable offence — the defining procedural gap between cognizable and non-cognizable cases.
-
Question 110 of 300
Under Section 173(1)(b)'s proviso, as added by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1992, if investigation is not complete within fourteen days of the FIR being recorded, the officer in charge must:
ExplanationThis 1992 amendment imposes a strict timeline: a fourteen-day investigation window, followed by a mandatory interim report within three more days if investigation isn't yet complete — the Court may then commence trial on the basis of that interim report.
-
Question 111 of 300
Under Section 418, an appeal may lie on a matter of fact as well as a matter of law, and the alleged severity of a sentence is treated as:
ExplanationSection 418 deems the alleged severity/inadequacy of a sentence to be a question of law for appeal purposes — a deliberate legal classification allowing sentence-related grievances to be raised on appeal like any other legal error.
-
Question 112 of 300
Under Section 62, every summons must be served by a police officer or, subject to rules, by an officer of the Court issuing it or:
ExplanationSection 62 gives three permitted routes for serving a summons: police officer, court officer, or another public servant — not an unrestricted general delivery method.
-
Question 113 of 300
Under Section 195, a Court cannot take cognizance of certain offences against public justice or contempt of public servants' lawful authority except on the complaint of:
ExplanationSection 195 restricts prosecution for these specific offence categories to complaints from the public servant concerned (or their administrative superior) — preventing private parties from freely prosecuting offences against the administration of justice.
-
Question 114 of 300
Section 491 empowers certain courts to issue directions of the nature of a writ of:
ExplanationSection 491 gives specified courts a statutory habeas-corpus-type power to direct that a person be brought before the court and their detention examined — operating alongside, though distinct from, the Constitution's own Article 199 remedy.
-
Question 115 of 300
Under Section 509, the deposition of a Civil Surgeon or other medical witness, taken and attested by a Magistrate in the accused's presence, may be given in evidence in an inquiry or trial, even if:
ExplanationSection 509 provides an evidentiary shortcut for routine medical evidence, allowing a properly-taken deposition to be used without requiring the medical witness's personal attendance at every subsequent stage — while still preserving the right to summon the witness under Section 509's own proviso if genuinely necessary.
-
Question 116 of 300
Under Section 31(3), an Assistant Sessions Judge may pass any sentence authorised by law EXCEPT:
ExplanationSection 31(3) caps an Assistant Sessions Judge's sentencing power below that of a full Sessions Judge, specifically excluding death sentences and imprisonment terms exceeding seven years.
-
Question 117 of 300
Under Section 156, a police officer in charge of a police station may investigate a cognizable case:
ExplanationSection 156 grants police an independent statutory right to investigate cognizable offences without needing prior judicial sanction — a foundational contrast with the non-cognizable procedure under Section 155.
-
Question 118 of 300
Under Section 227, a Court may alter or add to any charge:
ExplanationSection 227 gives courts continuing flexibility to correct or supplement a charge as the evidence unfolds, right up until judgment — reflecting that a charge is a working procedural document, not a rigid, unchangeable pleading.
-
Question 119 of 300
Under Section 6(1), besides the High Courts, there are how many classes of Criminal Courts in Pakistan?
ExplanationSection 6(1) establishes two classes of Criminal Courts besides the High Court: Courts of Session, and Courts of Magistrates.
-
Question 120 of 300
Under Section 512(1), before evidence may be recorded in an absconder's absence, it must be proved on record that the accused has absconded and:
ExplanationPakistani case law confirms the two substantive conditions — proven absconsion and no immediate prospect of arrest — must genuinely exist, but does not require a separate, freestanding formal finding beyond what the record itself establishes.
-
Question 121 of 300
Under Section 4(1)(b), a 'bailable offence' is one shown as bailable in the Second Schedule, or:
ExplanationSection 4(1)(b) defines 'bailable offence' with two routes: shown as bailable in the Second Schedule, OR made bailable by any other law currently in force. 'Non-bailable offence' means any other offence.
-
Question 122 of 300
Under Section 403(1), a person once tried by a competent Court and convicted or acquitted of an offence shall not, while that conviction or acquittal remains in force, be:
ExplanationSection 403(1) is the CrPC's double jeopardy ('autrefois acquit'/'autrefois convict') protection — barring retrial for the same offence or a substantially fact-overlapping different offence, subject to limited statutory exceptions (e.g., where the earlier court lacked competence to try the more serious later charge).
-
Question 123 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that a judgment must be recorded, dated, and signed at the time it is pronounced, meaning:
ExplanationPakistani courts have treated Sections 366-367's recording requirements as substantive, not merely formal — a judgment that is orally announced but never properly written and signed is legally inoperative and can be declared void by the High Court.
-
Question 124 of 300
Under Section 37, additional powers listed in the Fourth Schedule may be conferred on a Magistrate by the Provincial Government:
ExplanationSection 37 requires a High Court recommendation before the Provincial Government invests a Magistrate with additional (Fourth Schedule) powers beyond their ordinary Third Schedule powers.
-
Question 125 of 300
Under Section 4(2), words in the Code that are not separately defined take their meaning from:
ExplanationSection 4(2) directs that undefined words and expressions used in the CrPC are deemed to carry the meanings assigned to them in the Pakistan Penal Code.
-
Question 126 of 300
Under Section 6(2), as amended, there are three classes of Magistrate. These are Magistrates of the:
ExplanationSection 6(2) fixes three tiers: Magistrate of the First Class, Second Class, and Third Class — each carrying different sentencing powers under Section 32.
-
Question 127 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that a sentence cannot be enhanced suo motu in an appeal against conviction where:
ExplanationConsistent with the natural-justice principle running through Section 439(2), courts have held that an appellate bench cannot spring a sentence enhancement on an appellant who was never given notice of that possibility and where the State itself never sought it.
-
Question 128 of 300
Under Section 539, affidavits for use before a criminal court may be sworn before:
ExplanationSection 539 establishes the framework for who may administer oaths on affidavits used in criminal proceedings, ensuring a recognised, credible sworn-statement process rather than an ad hoc one.
-
Question 129 of 300
Superior courts in Pakistan have held that before registering an FIR upon a cognizable-offence complaint, the police officer:
ExplanationThis is one of the most consistently reinforced principles in Pakistani criminal procedure case law: the word 'shall' in Section 154 leaves no discretion — registration must occur first, with investigation (including verifying the complaint's truth) happening only afterward, not as a precondition to registration.
-
Question 130 of 300
Pakistani High Court Rules direct that, once a Sessions trial has begun, it should:
ExplanationHigh Court Rules and Orders direct day-to-day continuation of a Sessions trial once commenced — reflecting the principle that criminal trials, especially serious ones, should proceed with reasonable continuity rather than being allowed to drag on through repeated piecemeal adjournments.
-
Question 131 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that a police officer conducting a search must record the grounds for doing so in the police station diary (Roznamcha); failure to do so has been held to render the search:
ExplanationThis documentation requirement is treated as a genuine jurisdictional prerequisite for a police-conducted search, not a mere administrative formality — its omission has led courts to find the search itself unlawful.
-
Question 132 of 300
Section 514-A addresses procedure when a surety to a bond:
ExplanationSection 514-A specifically addresses the practical complications of a surety's insolvency or death, or bond forfeiture generally, ensuring the Court has a clear procedural path in these scenarios.
-
Question 133 of 300
Section 109 empowers action against a person taking precautions to conceal his presence within a Magistrate's jurisdiction, where there is reason to believe he is doing so with a view to committing:
ExplanationSection 109 targets concealment-with-criminal-intent specifically tied to a cognizable offence, distinguishing genuinely suspicious concealment from ordinary private conduct.
-
Question 134 of 300
Under Section 15(2), a Bench of Magistrates, absent a special direction otherwise, has the powers of a Magistrate of:
ExplanationSection 15(2) sets the default rule for Bench powers: the Bench collectively exercises the powers of its most senior participating member's class, not the lowest common denominator.
-
Question 135 of 300
Under Section 44(1), a person aware of the commission or intended commission of certain serious PPC offences must give information to the nearest Magistrate or police officer:
ExplanationSection 44(1) creates an affirmative duty to report knowledge of specified serious offences without delay, placing the burden of justifying any failure to do so on the person who stayed silent.
-
Question 136 of 300
Under Section 80, the officer executing a warrant of arrest must, if so required, show the person to be arrested:
ExplanationSection 80 requires the executing officer to notify the substance of the warrant and, if demanded, actually show the warrant to the person being arrested.
-
Question 137 of 300
Under Section 465, if an accused before a Court of Session or High Court appears to be of unsound mind and incapable of making his defence, the Court must first try that fact, and Pakistani courts have held this inquiry to be:
ExplanationSection 465's requirement is treated as mandatory rather than merely directory — skipping this inquiry where genuinely warranted can render the whole subsequent trial legally invalid, as reinforced by the widely-reported Zahir Jaffer case proceedings.
-
Question 138 of 300
Under the proviso to Section 145(1), if a party was forcibly and wrongfully dispossessed within a certain period before the Magistrate's order, he may be treated as being in possession — that period is:
ExplanationThe proviso to Section 145(1) lets the Magistrate treat a party dispossessed by force within the preceding two months as if he were still in possession, preventing a wrongdoer from benefiting from his own forcible dispossession of another.
-
Question 139 of 300
Under Section 46(3), nothing in this section gives a right to cause the death of a person who is not accused of an offence punishable with death or:
ExplanationSection 46(3) limits the use of lethal force in effecting an arrest to cases involving offences punishable with death or life imprisonment — a key proportionality safeguard.
-
Question 140 of 300
Under Section 526, before the High Court may itself withdraw and try a case (rather than merely transferring it), the section requires that:
ExplanationSection 526 builds in a procedural safeguard even for this powerful transfer/withdrawal remedy — the Public Prosecutor must be notified of the application, and the Court retains discretion to grant an adjournment in connection with it.
-
Question 141 of 300
Pakistani superior courts have held that once a competent civil court has already regulated possession of the disputed property (e.g., by an interim injunction), a Magistrate's jurisdiction under Section 145:
ExplanationPakistani case law (e.g., as reflected in Prosecutor General Punjab's compiled precedents) establishes that Section 145's summary jurisdiction yields once a civil court has already taken control of the possession question — reinforcing the provision's role as a stop-gap peace-keeping measure, not a substitute for civil adjudication.
-
Question 142 of 300
Under Section 417(2A), inserted by Act XX of 1994, the right to appeal an acquittal was extended to:
ExplanationSection 417(2A) broadened standing beyond the narrower original complainant-only route, allowing any person genuinely aggrieved by an acquittal to seek appellate review — a significant 1994 expansion of victims' appellate rights.
-
Question 143 of 300
Under Section 12(1), the Provincial Government may appoint Magistrates of the first, second, or third class in any district and may define:
ExplanationSection 12(1) lets the Provincial Government both appoint Magistrates and geographically define the local areas over which their conferred powers may be exercised.
-
Question 144 of 300
Under Section 241-A, the accused in a case triable by a Magistrate is entitled, before the framing of a charge, to be supplied with copies of:
ExplanationSection 241-A guarantees pre-charge disclosure — copies of the statements and documents the prosecution intends to use — giving the accused a genuine opportunity to prepare a defence before the charge is even framed.
-
Question 145 of 300
Under Section 5, offences under the Pakistan Penal Code are investigated, inquired into, and tried according to:
ExplanationSection 5(1) establishes the CrPC as the general procedural machinery for all PPC offences; Section 5(2) extends the same procedure to offences under other laws, subject to any special procedural law that may separately apply.
-
Question 146 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that once an Investigating Officer has obtained remand authorization under Section 167 and later seeks to release the accused under Section 169 for deficient evidence, that release:
ExplanationPakistani courts have held that a Section 169 release for deficient evidence is not a revolving door — an investigating officer cannot simply keep re-arresting and re-releasing the same person indefinitely on the same insufficient evidentiary basis.
-
Question 147 of 300
Under Section 265-L, the power to stay a prosecution before a Sessions Court belongs to the:
ExplanationSection 265-L gives the Advocate-General — the Province's chief law officer — a distinctive statutory power to stay a Sessions Court prosecution, a check not available to ordinary prosecutors or police officials.
-
Question 148 of 300
Pakistani case law establishes that when a Magistrate dismisses a complaint under Section 203, failure to record reasons for the dismissal is:
ExplanationPakistani courts have held that recording reasons for dismissal is essential — without them, a reviewing court cannot properly assess whether the Magistrate's discretion under Section 203 was exercised correctly, so the omission is treated as a genuine defect, not a mere formality.
-
Question 149 of 300
Under Section 102, when a place liable to search under this Chapter is found closed, the person residing in or in charge of it must, on the executing officer's demand and production of the warrant:
ExplanationSection 102 mirrors the arrest-related entry obligation under Section 47, but is specific to search warrants — non-cooperation here can trigger the forced-entry powers under the same section's later clauses.
-
Question 150 of 300
Under Section 103(2), witnesses to a search under this section are required to attend Court as witnesses of the search:
ExplanationSection 103(2) clarifies that merely witnessing a search does not automatically obligate a person to testify — they must be specially summoned by the Court.
-
Question 151 of 300
Under Section 160, a police officer investigating a case may, by order in writing, require the attendance of any person who appears to be acquainted with the case's facts, but generally may not require attendance of a person who is:
ExplanationSection 160 builds in a protective exception: persons under fifteen, and women, generally cannot be compelled to attend anywhere except their own residence for police questioning.
-
Question 152 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that postponing a case 'sine die' (indefinitely, without a fixed date) under Section 344 is:
ExplanationPakistani courts have held that Section 344 requires the Court to postpone proceedings to a fixed and definite date, not indefinitely — open-ended 'sine die' adjournment defeats the accused's right to a reasonably speedy resolution.
-
Question 153 of 300
Under Section 350, when a Presiding Officer is changed partway through a trial (e.g., due to transfer), the successor Judge:
ExplanationSection 350 allows continuity despite a change in the presiding officer, letting the successor rely on evidence already recorded (subject to safeguards), avoiding the waste of a full restart in every case of judicial transfer or reassignment.
-
Question 154 of 300
Under Section 86-A, when a person arrested under Section 85 is to be removed in custody to a place in the Tribal Areas, he must first be produced before a Magistrate who determines whether the evidence raises:
ExplanationSection 86-A requires a genuine evidentiary threshold — a strong or probable presumption of guilt — before a Magistrate may direct removal to Tribal Areas custody, rather than allowing automatic transfer on the strength of the warrant alone.
-
Question 155 of 300
Under Section 177, the ordinary rule for place of trial is that every offence shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by a Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction:
ExplanationSection 177 establishes the default territorial jurisdiction rule: trial occurs where the offence was committed, subject to numerous specific exceptions in the following sections (e.g., continuing offences, offences on a journey).
-
Question 156 of 300
Under Section 22-B, a Justice of the Peace who receives information of a cognizable offence must, among other duties, prevent removal of or interference with:
ExplanationSection 22-B(b) specifically requires a Justice of the Peace to help preserve the crime scene for a cognizable offence — protecting potential evidence from being disturbed before police can properly investigate.
-
Question 157 of 300
Under Section 61, a person arrested without warrant shall not be detained in custody for longer than, under the circumstances, is reasonable, and in the absence of a special Magistrate's order under Section 167, this shall not exceed:
ExplanationSection 61 is the CrPC's core 24-hour production rule — mirroring Article 10(2) of the Constitution — excluding time necessary for the journey to the Magistrate's court.
-
Question 158 of 300
Under Section 1(2), the Code extends to:
ExplanationSection 1(2) gives the Code nationwide extent across the whole of Pakistan, while preserving any special or local law, jurisdiction, or procedure already in force.
-
Question 159 of 300
Under Section 234, a person may be charged with, and tried at one trial for, up to three offences of the same kind committed within a period of:
ExplanationSection 234 permits joint trial of up to three same-kind offences committed within one year, avoiding the need for repeated separate trials for closely-spaced similar conduct.
-
Question 160 of 300
Under Section 196, no Court may take cognizance of certain offences against the State (e.g., waging war, sedition) except with the previous sanction of:
ExplanationSection 196 requires prior governmental sanction before prosecuting offences against the State — a significant check on privately or locally initiated prosecutions for such serious matters.
-
Question 161 of 300
Under Section 117, before finally ordering a person to give security, the Magistrate must:
ExplanationSection 117 requires a genuine inquiry — following, as nearly as may be, the procedure for trial of summons cases — before security can actually be ordered, protecting against baseless allegations.
-
Question 162 of 300
Under Section 93-A, when a Pakistani Court wants a summons served outside Pakistan at a place within a Pakistani-established foreign-jurisdiction Court's limits, it sends the summons, in duplicate, by post or otherwise, to:
ExplanationSection 93-A channels extraterritorial summons service through the presiding officer of the relevant Court established by the Federal Government's foreign jurisdiction — a mechanism dating to a 1914 amendment, relevant to processes involving Pakistanis abroad.
-
Question 163 of 300
Pakistani case law has clarified that Section 17(4) — allowing provision for urgent business during a Sessions Judge's unavoidable absence — applies to:
ExplanationPakistani courts have held that Section 17(4)'s special provision for handling urgent business during an unavoidable absence is specifically limited to Sessions Judges — an Additional Sessions Judge does not have the same standalone authority to make similar provision for his own absence.
-
Question 164 of 300
Under the Explanation to Section 344, a 'reasonable cause for remand' exists where sufficient evidence has been obtained to raise a suspicion the accused committed the offence, and:
ExplanationThe Explanation to Section 344 sets a two-part test for remand: existing evidence raising suspicion, PLUS a genuine likelihood that continued custody will actually yield further evidence — not remand as a routine default.
-
Question 165 of 300
Under Section 337, a tender of pardon may be made to an accomplice with a view to obtaining:
ExplanationSection 337 is the approver/accomplice-witness mechanism: a pardon is offered in exchange for full and true disclosure implicating other participants in the offence.
-
Question 166 of 300
Under Section 222, a charge must contain particulars as to the:
ExplanationSection 222 requires the charge to specify when, where, and against whom (if applicable) the offence was allegedly committed — giving the accused a fair opportunity to prepare a defence.
-
Question 167 of 300
Under Section 265-J, a statement recorded under Section 164 (before a Magistrate during investigation) is treated in a Sessions trial as:
ExplanationSection 265-J confirms the general evidentiary value of a properly-recorded Section 164 statement — reinforcing why Section 164 (Magistrate-recorded) statements carry far more weight than ordinary Section 161 (police-recorded) statements.
-
Question 168 of 300
Under Section 237, if in a case under Section 236 the accused is charged with one offence but it appears the facts show he committed a different offence, he may be:
ExplanationSection 237 permits conviction for the offence actually proven, even though the formal charge named a different one — provided the situation matches the alternative-charge scenario contemplated by Section 236.
-
Question 169 of 300
Under Section 528, the power to withdraw a case from an Assistant Sessions Judge belongs to:
ExplanationSection 528 gives the supervising Sessions Judge direct authority to withdraw a case from an Assistant Sessions Judge operating under him — a more localized and immediate check than requiring High Court intervention for routine caseload management within a sessions division.
-
Question 170 of 300
Under Section 200, a Magistrate taking cognizance of an offence on complaint must examine, upon oath, the complainant and:
ExplanationSection 200 requires the Magistrate to personally examine the complainant and any present witnesses under oath, recording the substance in writing — a screening step before process can issue.
-
Question 171 of 300
Under Section 72, where the person summoned is in active State or Railway Company service, the Court ordinarily sends the summons in duplicate to:
ExplanationSection 72 channels service through the employing office's head, who then serves the summons per Section 69 and returns proof of service to the Court under his own signature — treated as evidence of due service.
-
Question 172 of 300
Under Section 98(1), a Magistrate of the First Class may authorise search for stolen property, forged documents, or counterfeit currency, but the police officer executing it must be above the rank of:
ExplanationSection 98(1) restricts execution of this specialised search warrant to a police officer above the rank of constable.
-
Question 173 of 300
Under Section 103(1), before making a search, the officer must call upon how many respectable local inhabitants to witness the search?
ExplanationSection 103(1) requires at least two respectable local inhabitants to witness a search — a core procedural safeguard against fabricated recoveries, frequently tested in judicial exams.
-
Question 174 of 300
Under Section 341, where the accused does not understand the proceedings, the Court must:
ExplanationSection 341 protects the basic fairness of the trial by requiring genuine comprehension — mirroring Section 361's similar interpretation safeguard for evidence recording — rather than allowing proceedings to continue over an accused's head.
-
Question 175 of 300
Section 514-B specifically addresses bonds required from:
ExplanationSection 514-B recognises that a minor cannot be bound in the ordinary way, and provides special procedure for bonds required from a person who is a minor.
-
Question 176 of 300
Under Section 41, the power to withdraw powers previously conferred under the Code belongs to the Provincial Government, acting on:
ExplanationSection 41 mirrors the conferment provisions: just as the High Court's recommendation is generally required to invest powers, its recommendation is likewise required before those powers can be withdrawn.
-
Question 177 of 300
Under the proviso to Section 108, no proceedings for disseminating seditious matter shall be taken against the editor, proprietor, printer or publisher of a registered publication (edited/printed/published in conformity with press law), EXCEPT:
ExplanationSection 108's proviso gives registered press publications a procedural shield — action against their editors/proprietors/publishers requires specific Provincial Government authorisation, not an ordinary Magistrate's initiative alone, reflecting a deliberate check on the potential misuse of this provision against the press.
-
Question 178 of 300
Under the proviso to Section 33(1), where imprisonment is awarded as part of a substantive sentence, imprisonment in default of paying a fine shall not exceed what fraction of the Magistrate's competent imprisonment power for that offence?
ExplanationSection 33(1)'s proviso caps default-of-fine imprisonment at one-fourth of what the Magistrate could otherwise impose as a substantive sentence for that offence — preventing default imprisonment from effectively exceeding the Magistrate's real sentencing authority.
-
Question 179 of 300
Under Section 439(2), no order may be made under this section to the prejudice of the accused unless:
ExplanationSection 439(2) is a natural-justice safeguard: a prejudicial revisional order (such as a sentence enhancement) cannot be made without first giving the accused a genuine hearing.
-
Question 180 of 300
Under Section 492, the power to appoint Public Prosecutors for conducting prosecutions in Court belongs to:
ExplanationSection 492 vests the appointment of Public Prosecutors in the Government, reflecting the State's central institutional role in criminal prosecution.
-
Question 181 of 300
Under Section 164, a confession or statement made in the course of an investigation may be recorded by:
ExplanationSection 164 vests the power to record a genuinely evidentiary confession/statement in a Magistrate — deliberately not the police — precisely because police-recorded statements under Section 161/162 carry so little evidentiary weight.
-
Question 182 of 300
Pakistani case law has clarified that in Sessions Court proceedings, compliance with Section 265-C (supply of documents) must occur:
ExplanationThe Sindh High Court has confirmed the mandatory sequence: the accused must first be supplied the relevant documents under Section 265-C so he understands the exact nature of the allegations against him, before the Court proceeds to frame the charge under Section 265-D.
-
Question 183 of 300
Section 343 provides that, except as provided in Sections 337 and 338 (tender of pardon), no influence by means of a promise, threat, or otherwise shall be used to an accused person to induce him to:
ExplanationSection 343 is a general integrity safeguard for the criminal process — outside the specific, regulated pardon mechanism of Sections 337-338, no one may pressure an accused (through promises or threats) into either revealing or concealing what he knows.
-
Question 184 of 300
Under Section 382, execution of a capital sentence on a woman found to be pregnant must be:
ExplanationSection 382 provides a humanitarian safeguard: postponement of a pregnant woman's death sentence, with the possibility of commutation to life imprisonment.
-
Question 185 of 300
Section 106 empowers a Court, upon convicting a person of certain offences involving a breach of the peace, to order him to execute a bond for:
ExplanationSection 106 is the conviction-linked security provision — distinct from Section 107's non-conviction-based version — capping the peace bond at three years, attached directly to a criminal conviction.
-
Question 186 of 300
Under Section 195(1)(c), prosecution for forgery-related offences under Sections 463, 471, 475, or 476 PPC, committed by a party in relation to a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding, requires a complaint in writing from:
ExplanationSection 195(1)(c) channels forgery prosecutions tied to court proceedings through that specific Court's own complaint — preventing private parties from freely launching forgery prosecutions over documents used in litigation without the court's own initiative.
-
Question 187 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that a search conducted without a valid search warrant, where one was legally required, is:
ExplanationPakistani courts have treated an unwarranted search, where a warrant was required, as going to the root of legality — not a mere technical defect, but a fundamental jurisdictional flaw affecting everything that follows from it.
-
Question 188 of 300
Under Section 31(2), a sentence of death passed by a Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge is:
ExplanationSection 31(2) requires every death sentence passed by a Sessions Judge (or Additional Sessions Judge) to be confirmed by the High Court before it can be executed — a critical safeguard covered in Chapter XXVII.
-
Question 189 of 300
What is the status of the original Chapter XXIII (Sections 266 to 336), which once governed trials before the High Court and Court of Session generally?
ExplanationLike Chapter XVIII (Sections 206-220), Chapter XXIII's Sections 266-336 have been entirely omitted from the current Code — this entire numeric range was superseded by Chapter XXII-A's Sections 265-A through 265-N, which now govern trials before the High Court and Court of Session on a police report.
-
Question 190 of 300
Under Section 101, the general provisions on direction, execution, and related procedural safeguards for arrest warrants (such as Sections 75, 79, 82, 83, 84) are applied, so far as may be, to search warrants issued under:
ExplanationSection 101 is a bridging provision that imports the established arrest-warrant procedural framework into the search-warrant context, avoiding the need to separately re-legislate the same safeguards for search warrants.
-
Question 191 of 300
Section 386 addresses the direction of a warrant for the levy of a fine, permitting such a warrant to be directed to:
ExplanationSection 386 gives flexibility for fine-recovery: the Collector is the ordinary recipient of such a warrant, but a police officer or other suitable person may be used instead with proper sanction.
-
Question 192 of 300
Pakistani case law confirms that while sanction for one charge against a public servant is awaited, the Magistrate:
ExplanationCourts have taken a practical approach: sanction requirements for one specific charge do not have to freeze an entire prosecution — charges not requiring sanction may proceed in parallel while sanction for the sanction-requiring charge is awaited.
-
Question 193 of 300
Under Section 110, a Magistrate may require security for good behaviour, for a period not exceeding three years, from a person shown by evidence of general repute to be:
ExplanationSection 110 targets habitual offenders and dangerous persons specifically, allowing security bonds of up to three years based on evidence of general reputation, not merely suspicion of a single act.
-
Question 194 of 300
Under Section 100, the power to issue a search warrant for a wrongfully confined person is conferred specifically on:
ExplanationSection 100 deliberately restricts this power to a Magistrate of the First Class or Sub-Divisional Magistrate — the law channels this liberty-protecting power through a specific, accountable judicial officer rather than leaving it open to any authority.
-
Question 195 of 300
Pakistani case law has clarified that offences of criminal breach of trust and falsification of accounts (different offences, not committed in the same transaction) cannot be joined together under:
ExplanationThe Supreme Court (Shah Nawaz, 1992 SCMR 1583) held that breach of trust and falsification of accounts are not the 'same kind' of offence for Section 234 purposes, and absent a genuine same-transaction link under Section 235, joining them in one trial is illegal.
-
Question 196 of 300
Under Section 89, a person whose attached property was disposed of under Section 88(7) may recover it (or its sale proceeds) if he appears or is apprehended within how many years of the attachment and satisfies the Court he did not abscond to evade the warrant?
ExplanationSection 89 gives a two-year window for restoration of attached property (or proceeds) once the person satisfies the Court of a genuine, non-evasive reason for his earlier absence.
-
Question 197 of 300
Under Section 172, a police officer conducting an investigation is required to maintain a diary setting out the time at which information was received, the time investigation began and closed, and:
ExplanationSection 172's case diary is a contemporaneous record of the investigation's factual progress — a document courts may call for, though it is generally treated as privileged and not directly usable as evidence against the accused.
-
Question 198 of 300
Under Section 355, in cases tried by First and Second Class Magistrates, the Magistrate must, as the case proceeds, prepare a memorandum of the substance of the evidence, ordinarily:
ExplanationSection 355 requires the Magistrate personally to prepare the evidence memorandum in writing as the case proceeds; Pakistani courts have held that failing to keep this personally-made memorandum is an irregularity, though one that may be curable under Section 537 rather than automatically fatal.
-
Question 199 of 300
Under Section 54(1), first clause, a police officer may arrest without warrant any person concerned in a cognizable offence, or against whom a reasonable complaint has been made, or:
ExplanationSection 54(1) 'first' establishes three alternative triggers for warrantless arrest in a cognizable matter: concerned in the offence, reasonable complaint, credible information, or reasonable suspicion — any one suffices.
-
Question 200 of 300
Under Section 47, if a person acting under an arrest warrant (or a police officer with arrest authority) believes the person sought has entered a particular place, the occupant must:
ExplanationSection 47 obliges an occupant to cooperate with a legitimate arrest-related search once demand is made — refusal or obstruction can trigger the forced-entry powers in Section 48.
-
Question 201 of 300
Pakistani case law confirms that a Section 491 habeas corpus petition may be filed by:
ExplanationPakistani courts have recognised broad standing for habeas corpus petitions — not limited to the detainee himself or close relatives, but extending even to a stranger acting in genuine good faith to secure the release of someone unlawfully confined.
-
Question 202 of 300
Unlike Section 234's strict cap of three offences within one year, Section 235 (offences arising from the same transaction) imposes:
ExplanationSection 235's same-transaction joinder is not bound by Section 234's numeric/time restrictions — the operative test is instead whether the offences are genuinely and directly connected as part of one transaction.
-
Question 203 of 300
Under Section 154(1), a copy of the recorded FIR information must be given to the informant:
ExplanationSection 154(1) requires the informant to receive a free copy of the recorded FIR immediately ('forthwith') — not upon request, not for a fee, and not after some delay.
-
Question 204 of 300
Under Section 366, judgment in every criminal trial must be pronounced:
ExplanationSection 366 requires open-Court pronouncement of judgment — a transparency safeguard, whether delivered immediately after the hearing concludes or at a later announced sitting.
-
Question 205 of 300
Under Section 470, when a person is acquitted on the ground of unsoundness of mind, the finding must specifically state:
ExplanationSection 470 requires the finding to clarify whether the act was actually committed — critical because a person acquitted this way is not simply released, but may be detained in safe custody under the following sections.
-
Question 206 of 300
Under Section 537, a finding, sentence, or order is generally NOT to be reversed merely on account of an error, omission, or irregularity in the charge or other proceedings, unless:
ExplanationSection 537 embodies the 'curable irregularity' doctrine — reversal requires showing the error actually caused a failure of justice, not merely that a technical departure from correct procedure occurred. Pakistani courts have applied this to hold, for instance, that even non-compliance with Section 342 can sometimes be cured if no real prejudice resulted, though the general rule (per Barkat Ali, PLD 1960 Lah. 140) treats Section 342 omission as serious enough to normally vitiate a trial.
-
Question 207 of 300
Under Section 167, when investigation cannot be completed within twenty-four hours, the accused must be forwarded to a Magistrate, who may authorise detention in police custody (physical remand) for a maximum period of:
ExplanationSection 167 caps physical (police-custody) remand at fifteen days in total — a cornerstone provision protecting against indefinite police detention, distinct from further judicial-custody detention that may follow.
-
Question 208 of 300
The Supreme Court (Muzaffar Iqbal v. Muhammad Imran Aziz, 2004 SCMR 231) has held that the considerations for cancelling bail already granted are:
ExplanationThis is a foundational bail-law principle: granting bail and cancelling it are governed by different standards — cancellation is treated as the more serious, harder-to-justify step, requiring genuinely strong and exceptional grounds rather than simply re-arguing the original bail decision.
-
Question 209 of 300
Pakistani courts have held that in exercising Section 561-A jurisdiction to quash proceedings before trial, the High Court must:
ExplanationCourts have consistently held the High Court cannot assume the trial court's role by weighing evidence at the 561-A stage — it examines only whether, taking the allegations as they stand, a prima facie case exists, leaving genuine evidentiary assessment to the trial itself.
-
Question 210 of 300
Under the proviso to Section 94(1), the specific PPC offences for which a police officer MAY (with Sessions Judge permission) demand bank-account documents include Sections 403, 406, 408, 409, and:
ExplanationSection 94(1)'s proviso lists a specific, closed set of offences — breach of trust (403/406/408/409), fraudulent property-transfer offences (421-424), and forgery-related offences (465-477A) — for which bank documents may be sought via Sessions Judge permission; all other cases require High Court permission instead.
-
Question 211 of 300
Under Section 39(2), an order conferring powers under the Code takes effect from:
ExplanationSection 39(2) ties the effective date of a power-conferring order to actual communication to the empowered person, not merely to when the order is made or signed.
-
Question 212 of 300
The Sindh High Court has clarified that Section 561-A's inherent jurisdiction applies specifically to:
ExplanationFollowing Shahnaz Begum v. Judges of the High Court of Sind and Balochistan (PLD 1971), courts have held that 561-A reaches judicial proceedings pending before a subordinate court — not police-department matters like FIR registration or investigation, which instead fall under the Constitution's Article 199 writ jurisdiction where malafide or lack of jurisdiction is shown.
-
Question 213 of 300
Section 126 addresses the discharge of sureties, allowing a surety for a bond under this Chapter to apply to be relieved of an obligation:
ExplanationSection 126 lets a surety seek discharge from an ongoing bond obligation, ensuring sureties are not permanently locked into an open-ended commitment against their will.
-
Question 214 of 300
Under Section 410, an appeal from a sentence passed by a Court of Session lies to the:
ExplanationSection 410 channels appeals from Sessions Court sentences to the High Court, generally to be filed within sixty days from the judgment date.
-
Question 215 of 300
Under Section 239, persons who may be charged and tried together at one trial include those accused of the same offence committed in the course of the same transaction, and:
ExplanationSection 239 lists specific categories of persons who may be jointly tried, including principal offenders together with abettors or those who attempted the same offence — preventing arbitrary joinder beyond these defined categories.
-
Question 216 of 300
Under Section 45(1), village headmen, accountants, and similar local officials are bound to report matters including the residence of a notorious receiver of stolen property, and also:
ExplanationSection 45(1)(d) specifically requires reporting sudden, unnatural, or suspicious deaths (and discovered corpses) — an early-warning mechanism feeding into the Section 174 inquest process, especially important in areas with limited direct police presence.
-
Question 217 of 300
Under Section 342(2), an accused who refuses to answer questions, or gives false answers, during his examination under this section is:
ExplanationSection 342(2) protects the accused from punishment for either staying silent or answering falsely during this examination — reinforcing that it exists to give him a fair chance to explain himself, not to trap him into a fresh offence.
-
Question 218 of 300
Under Section 185, where there is doubt as to which of several courts having jurisdiction should inquire into or try a case, the matter is decided by the:
ExplanationSection 185 resolves jurisdictional disputes between courts by placing the final decision with the High Court, ensuring a uniform, judicially-supervised resolution rather than leaving it to the parties or police.
-
Question 219 of 300
Under Section 188, an offence committed by a Pakistani citizen outside Pakistan may be dealt with as though it had been committed:
ExplanationSection 188 gives Pakistani courts extraterritorial jurisdiction over offences committed abroad by Pakistani citizens, treating the offence as if committed wherever the offender is subsequently found (or as the Federal Government directs).
-
Question 220 of 300
Under Section 404, no appeal lies from any judgment or order of a criminal court:
ExplanationSection 404 establishes that the right of appeal is not inherent — it exists only where the Code or another statute specifically creates it, making it an exhaustive rather than general right.
-
Question 221 of 300
Under Section 495, permission for a private person to conduct a prosecution (instead of, or alongside, the Public Prosecutor) may be granted by the Court, but that private prosecutor generally acts:
ExplanationSection 495 allows private participation in prosecution but subordinates it to the Public Prosecutor's overall direction, preserving the State's supervisory role even when a private party is actively involved.
-
Question 222 of 300
Pakistani case law confirms that a Magistrate reviewing a Section 173 police report and disagreeing with its conclusions may take cognizance under Section 190(1)(b):
ExplanationThe Supreme Court (Muhammad Akbar, 1972 SCMR 335) confirmed that the Magistrate's own independent assessment of the material governs — a negative or exculpatory police report does not bind him if the record itself supports a prima facie case.
-
Question 223 of 300
Under Section 376, in confirmation proceedings, the High Court has the power to:
ExplanationSection 376 gives the High Court very broad powers in confirmation proceedings — going well beyond a simple yes/no on the death sentence, extending to acquittal, retrial, or substituting a different conviction altogether.
-
Question 224 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that misjoinder of charges is:
ExplanationUnlike many procedural irregularities that Section 537 can excuse, Pakistani courts (Qadar Dad v. Sultan Bibi, PLD 1956 FC 129) have held that misjoinder of charges goes to the root of a fair trial and is NOT curable — it vitiates the proceedings outright.
-
Question 225 of 300
Under Section 28, an offence under the Pakistan Penal Code may be tried by the High Court, the Court of Session, or:
ExplanationSection 28 channels PPC-offence trials to whichever Court the Second Schedule's eighth column designates as competent, in addition to the High Court and Sessions Court, which retain general competence.
-
Question 226 of 300
Pakistani case law distinguishes a 'judgment' from other court orders by holding that:
ExplanationPakistani courts have clarified that not every order in a criminal matter is a 'judgment' — the term specifically refers to a final decision terminating in conviction or acquittal; an order of discharge, for instance, is not itself a judgment.
-
Question 227 of 300
Pakistani case law has clarified that a person is only legally considered to be 'absconding' for CrPC purposes:
ExplanationPakistani courts have held that merely staying away following an occurrence — before any warrant or proclamation — does not legally amount to 'absconding'; that specific legal status only attaches once a Section 87 proclamation has actually been issued.
-
Question 228 of 300
Section 127 empowers a Magistrate or police officer to order an unlawful assembly (or any assembly likely to cause a disturbance) to:
ExplanationSection 127 is the basic dispersal-order provision for unlawful or disturbance-likely assemblies, forming the legal foundation before escalation to civil or military force under Sections 128-131.
-
Question 229 of 300
Pakistani case law distinguishes Section 522 from Section 517 by noting that under Section 522, the person seeking restoration of possession:
ExplanationPakistani courts have clarified a subtle but real distinction: Section 517 requires the claimant to actually assert entitlement to possession, while Section 522 restoration does not require the dispossessed person to make that same claim of entitlement.
-
Question 230 of 300
Under Section 221, a charge must state the offence with which the accused is charged, and:
ExplanationSection 221 requires the offence to be described by its specific legal name where the law provides one; if there is no specific name, the definition must be stated so as to give the accused notice of the matter charged.
-
Question 231 of 300
Under Section 339, a person to whom a pardon has been tendered and accepted is examined as a witness, and if the Court is later satisfied he has not made a full and true disclosure, he may be:
ExplanationSection 339 makes the pardon conditional on genuine, complete disclosure — if the approver reneges or lies, he loses the pardon's protection and faces prosecution both for the original offence and for perjury.
-
Question 232 of 300
Under Section 338, the power to tender a pardon under Section 337, in a case triable exclusively by (or committed to) the Court of Session or High Court, belongs to:
ExplanationSection 338 channels the more serious pardon-tender power (for cases within Sessions/High Court jurisdiction) to the trying Court itself, distinguishing it from a Magistrate's more limited tender power under Section 337 in lesser cases.
-
Question 233 of 300
Under Section 371, a copy of the judgment must be given to the accused, and in the case of a sentence of death, this requirement is treated with:
ExplanationSection 371 specifically addresses the death-sentence scenario for providing the accused a copy of the judgment, reflecting the heightened procedural care warranted by the sentence's finality.
-
Question 234 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that even where a sentence has already been served out or a fine already paid, the High Court in revision:
ExplanationPakistani courts have confirmed that a sentence's enhancement power under Section 439 survives even after the original sentence has already been fully served or the fine paid — completion of the original sentence does not extinguish the revisional power.
-
Question 235 of 300
Section 529 lists certain irregularities in criminal proceedings (such as specific procedural missteps by a Magistrate without proper authority) that:
ExplanationSection 529 protects proceedings from being thrown out over technical irregularities that fall within its listed categories — reflecting a substance-over-form approach, distinct from Section 530's list of irregularities that DO vitiate proceedings.
-
Question 236 of 300
Under the illustration to Section 403, if 'A' is tried and convicted for causing grievous hurt to 'B', and 'B' later dies from that injury, 'A':
ExplanationThis is the Code's own illustrative example clarifying that Section 403's bar does not apply where a materially new consequence (the victim's death) gives rise to a genuinely distinct offence not fully litigated in the first trial.
-
Question 237 of 300
Pakistani case law has clarified that the protection of Section 197 (prior sanction for prosecuting public servants) applies to acts that:
ExplanationCourts have clarified that Section 197's protection is not about whether the specific act was 'authorised' (an offence is never authorised) but whether it is reasonably connected to the discharge of official duties — a nuanced test that has, for instance, required sanction for an assault but not for a related wrongful confinement in the same incident.
-
Question 238 of 300
Under Section 367, a judgment must contain the point or points for determination, the decision on them, and:
ExplanationSection 367 requires a reasoned judgment — not merely a bare verdict — stating the points for determination, the Court's decision, and the reasoning behind it.
-
Question 239 of 300
Under Section 16, rules for the guidance of Magistrates' Benches (covering matters like classes of cases, sitting times, and Bench constitution) are made by:
ExplanationSection 16 centralises Bench-governance rulemaking in the Provincial Government, ensuring consistent administrative standards across Magistrate Benches within a district.
-
Question 240 of 300
Under Section 7(1), each Province consists of sessions divisions, and every sessions division shall, for Code purposes, be or consist of:
ExplanationSection 7(1) defines the basic territorial building block for the Sessions Court system: a sessions division is composed of one or more districts.
-
Question 241 of 300
Under Section 420, an appellant who is in jail may present his petition of appeal by:
ExplanationSection 420 accommodates an incarcerated appellant's practical inability to personally file paperwork — the jail superintendent acts as the conduit, forwarding the petition to the proper Appellate Court.
-
Question 242 of 300
Under Section 263, in a summarily-tried case where no appeal lies, the record kept is:
ExplanationSection 263 permits an abbreviated record in non-appealable summary cases, reflecting the streamlined nature of summary trial procedure as a whole.
-
Question 243 of 300
Pakistani case law establishes that a Magistrate receiving a Section 173 report:
ExplanationBecause Section 173(3) uses the word 'may' rather than 'shall' in describing how the Magistrate treats the report, established Pakistani criminal procedure principle holds that the investigating officer's opinion is never binding on the Magistrate's own independent judgment.
-
Question 244 of 300
Under Section 204, once a Magistrate is satisfied there are sufficient grounds for proceeding, he issues process, which in a summons case is a summons, and in a warrant case is:
ExplanationSection 204 gives the Magistrate discretion even in warrant cases to issue a summons instead, if he considers it appropriate — process need not automatically escalate to a warrant.
-
Question 245 of 300
Under Section 162, a statement made to a police officer during investigation:
ExplanationSection 162 deliberately withholds evidentiary weight from police statements — they are unsigned and generally usable only to contradict the witness at trial, not as independent proof of the facts stated.
-
Question 246 of 300
Under Section 265-D, in a case triable by the High Court or Court of Session, if the Court finds no ground to discharge the accused, it must:
ExplanationSection 265-D requires the formal framing of a charge once the Court is satisfied there is no ground for discharge — a mandatory procedural checkpoint before evidence-taking begins.
-
Question 247 of 300
Under Section 156(3), a Magistrate empowered under Section 190 may order an investigation of a cognizable case as described in Section 156, meaning the Magistrate can direct police investigation even:
ExplanationSection 156(3) gives a Magistrate the power to set police investigation in motion for a cognizable case even at the pre-cognizance stage, reinforcing the police's central investigative role under judicial oversight.
-
Question 248 of 300
Under Section 3(1), references in pre-Code enactments to the earlier Criminal Procedure Acts (1861, 1872, 1882) are, so far as practicable, to be taken as references to:
ExplanationSection 3(1) is a transitional bridging provision, redirecting old statutory cross-references to the equivalent provisions of the 1898 Code rather than leaving them pointing at repealed legislation.
-
Question 249 of 300
Under Section 190(1), a Magistrate may take cognizance of an offence in three ways: upon a complaint, upon a police report, or:
ExplanationSection 190(1) lists three independent routes to cognizance: (a) complaint, (b) police report, (c) other information or the Magistrate's own knowledge/suspicion — a foundational provision for judicial exams.
-
Question 250 of 300
Under Section 103(5), a person who, without reasonable cause, refuses to attend and witness a search when validly called upon commits an offence under which PPC section?
ExplanationSection 103(5) makes unjustified refusal to witness a search, after a proper written call to do so, an offence under Section 187 of the Pakistan Penal Code.
-
Question 251 of 300
Section 526 empowers the High Court to transfer a criminal case from one court to another, or:
ExplanationSection 526 gives the High Court the unusual power not just to transfer a case elsewhere, but to withdraw it entirely and try it itself, on grounds such as a reasonable apprehension of an unfair trial.
-
Question 252 of 300
An application under Section 249-A/265-K (early acquittal in the trial court) is functionally distinct from a Section 561-A petition, in that Section 561-A:
ExplanationWhile 249-A/265-K applications ask the trial court itself to acquit based on the record already before it, a Section 561-A petition goes to the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to quash the FIR or proceedings as an abuse of process — different forums, different legal tests, though both aim to spare an accused a baseless trial.
-
Question 253 of 300
Under Section 344, if from the absence of a witness or other reasonable cause it is necessary to postpone an inquiry or trial, the Court may, if it thinks fit, remand the accused, and no remand under this section may exceed:
ExplanationSection 344 governs mid-trial remands for postponement/adjournment (distinct from Section 167's pre-cognizance investigation remand), with courts generally holding that individual remand periods should not ordinarily exceed fifteen days, and that indefinite or repeated adjournments without genuine cause are impermissible.
-
Question 254 of 300
Under Section 173, upon completion of investigation, the officer in charge must submit a report to a Magistrate, commonly known in practice as the:
ExplanationSection 173's police report — universally called the 'challan' in Pakistani practice — sets out the result of investigation and forms the basis for the Magistrate's decision on whether to proceed against the accused.
-
Question 255 of 300
Pakistani superior courts have clarified that Section 512 permits recording witness depositions in an absconder's absence, but this:
ExplanationPakistani courts (including the Lahore High Court, which directed police to stop mislabelling these as 'challans') have been explicit that Section 512 proceedings are NOT a trial in absentia — ordinary criminal procedure in Pakistan does not permit conviction in absentia at all. Section 512 exists solely to preserve evidence that might otherwise be lost (e.g., an elderly or ailing witness) so it remains available once the accused is eventually apprehended and given a genuine trial.
-
Question 256 of 300
Under Section 199, no Court shall take cognizance of an offence of adultery or enticing a married woman except upon a complaint made by:
ExplanationSection 199 restricts standing to bring such a complaint to the husband (or his authorised representative in his absence) — a narrow, specifically defined complainant category.
-
Question 257 of 300
Pakistani case law has held that where a First Class Magistrate specially empowered under Section 30 is succeeded by another such Magistrate, the successor:
ExplanationThis case law extends the same practical continuity principle found in Section 350 specifically to Section 30-empowered Magistrates — a successor need not discard evidence properly recorded by his predecessor in the same case.
-
Question 258 of 300
Section 174 requires the police to investigate and report on cases of:
ExplanationSection 174 establishes the inquest procedure — police investigation and reporting on suicides and suspicious or unexplained deaths — distinct from an ordinary criminal investigation into a known offence.
-
Question 259 of 300
Under Section 4(1)(t), a 'Public Prosecutor' means any person appointed under Section 492, and also includes:
ExplanationSection 4(1)(t) extends the 'Public Prosecutor' definition beyond the formally appointed officer to include persons acting under that officer's direction, and those conducting State prosecutions in a High Court's original jurisdiction.
-
Question 260 of 300
Under Section 180, where an act is an offence by reason of its relation to any other act which is also an offence (or would be an offence if the doer were capable of committing one), the first offence may be inquired into or tried by a Court within whose jurisdiction:
ExplanationSection 180 extends jurisdiction to cover either linked act's location — relevant, for example, to receiving stolen property, where the theft and the receiving may occur in different districts.
-
Question 261 of 300
Under Section 42, every person is bound to assist a Magistrate or police officer reasonably demanding aid in taking or preventing the escape of a person the officer is authorised to arrest, and in:
ExplanationSection 42 imposes a public duty to assist in two specific circumstances: aiding an authorised arrest, and preventing a breach of the peace or injury to specified public infrastructure.
-
Question 262 of 300
Pakistani courts have described cancellation of bail as a harsh order because it interferes with individual liberty, and have held that it:
ExplanationBecause cancellation directly reverses a liberty already granted, Pakistani superior courts have consistently emphasised genuine caution and restraint before taking that step, rather than treating it as a routine or easily-triggered remedy.
-
Question 263 of 300
Pakistani legal commentary distinguishes sanction under Section 195(1)(b) from sanction under Sections 196/197 by noting that the former is granted by:
ExplanationThis distinction matters practically: Section 195(1)(b) sanction comes from the Court's own judicial assessment of proceedings before it, whereas Sections 196 and 197 sanctions are executive decisions made by the Government — different decision-makers operating in fundamentally different capacities.
-
Question 264 of 300
Under Section 342, the Court's examination of the accused (to explain circumstances appearing in evidence against him) is conducted:
ExplanationSection 342 examination is not sworn testimony and is not subject to prosecution cross-examination — its purpose is to give the accused a fair opportunity to explain incriminating evidence, not to generate fresh evidence against him. Pakistani courts have held omitting this examination can vitiate a trial entirely.
-
Question 265 of 300
Under Section 4(1)(l), 'investigation' includes all proceedings under the Code for the collection of evidence, conducted by:
ExplanationSection 4(1)(l) defines 'investigation' to cover both police-conducted evidence-collection and evidence-collection by a person specifically authorised by a Magistrate — but explicitly excludes a Magistrate's own inquiry.
-
Question 266 of 300
The Supreme Court (Khaja Fazal Karim, PLD 1976 SC 461) clarified that the Section 561-A power is:
ExplanationThis ruling guards against 561-A being used to bypass the Code's ordinary procedural remedies — it exists for genuine grievances with no other available redress, not as a shortcut around normal appeal or revision channels.
-
Question 267 of 300
Under Section 233, the general rule is that for every distinct offence of which a person is accused, there shall be:
ExplanationSection 233 sets the default rule against combining unrelated offences in one trial — separate charge, separate trial — with exceptions carved out in Sections 234-239 for specific situations like offences of the same kind within a year.
-
Question 268 of 300
Under Section 514, if a bond (for appearance, security, or similar purpose) is forfeited, the Court may call upon the person bound to pay the penalty, and if it is not paid, the Court may:
ExplanationSection 514 gives criminal courts direct enforcement power over forfeited bonds — recovery through property sale or default imprisonment — rather than requiring separate civil litigation to collect on a broken bond.
-
Question 269 of 300
Section 565, the Code's final substantive section, addresses notification requirements for:
ExplanationSection 565 closes out the Code with a surveillance-style provision requiring certain previously convicted offenders to notify their address, aimed at ongoing monitoring rather than a fresh criminal proceeding.
-
Question 270 of 300
Section 144 empowers a Magistrate, in urgent cases of nuisance or apprehended danger, to issue an order:
ExplanationSection 144's defining feature is speed: it permits an immediately-effective order in genuinely urgent situations, bypassing the normal notice-and-hearing procedure that other nuisance provisions require — the classic basis for imposing curfews or assembly bans.
-
Question 271 of 300
Under Section 426(1), pending an appeal by a convicted person, the Appellate Court may, for reasons to be recorded, order:
ExplanationSection 426(1) empowers the Appellate Court to suspend the sentence and grant bail during the appeal's pendency — a distinct mechanism from Section 497 ordinary bail, focused specifically on the appeal period.
-
Question 272 of 300
Under Section 374, a sentence of death passed by a Court of Session must be submitted to the:
ExplanationSection 374 requires every Sessions Court death sentence to go through mandatory High Court confirmation before execution — an automatic, non-optional safeguard that doesn't depend on the convict filing an appeal.
-
Question 273 of 300
Under Section 151, a police officer may arrest, without orders from a Magistrate and without a warrant, a person designing to commit a cognizable offence, if the commission of the offence:
ExplanationSection 151 authorises genuinely preventive arrest — before the offence occurs — but only where the arrest is truly necessary because the offence cannot otherwise be prevented, guarding against pretextual pre-emptive arrests.
-
Question 274 of 300
Under Section 179, where an act is an offence by reason of anything done and of a consequence that ensued, the offence may be inquired into or tried by a Court within whose local jurisdiction:
ExplanationSection 179 gives concurrent territorial jurisdiction to the courts of both the place of the act and the place of its consequence — relevant, for instance, where an injury inflicted in one district causes death in another.
-
Question 275 of 300
Under Section 169, if the evidence gathered is deemed deficient to justify forwarding the accused to a Magistrate, the officer in charge must:
ExplanationSection 169 requires release of the accused when the evidence is insufficient — with a possible bond requirement to appear later — rather than open-ended detention while investigation continues.
-
Question 276 of 300
Under the third proviso to Section 497, a bail entitlement can arise purely from delay, where trial of a bailable-by-this-route case has not concluded within a specified period through no fault of the accused, reflecting the principle that:
ExplanationThe statutory-delay proviso recognises that indefinitely prolonging pre-trial detention — even for a serious charge — itself becomes constitutionally and legally problematic, giving rise to a bail entitlement grounded in the delay itself rather than in the merits of the charge.
-
Question 277 of 300
Under Section 57(3), if a person's true name and residence are not ascertained within how many hours of arrest (for refusing to give name/residence), he must be forwarded to the nearest Magistrate?
ExplanationSection 57(3) gives a twenty-four hour window to verify identity before the person must be produced before a Magistrate having jurisdiction.
-
Question 278 of 300
Pakistani superior courts have held that a fugitive who has been declared a proclaimed offender or absconder generally:
ExplanationRecent superior court rulings — including in a high-profile case reported at PLD 2024 SC 610 — have reaffirmed that a fugitive from justice generally cannot invoke the Court's relief-granting jurisdiction through counsel or power of attorney without first surrendering, reflecting the principle that one cannot simultaneously defy the Court's process and seek its protection.
-
Question 279 of 300
Under Section 112, when a Magistrate acting under Sections 107-110 decides to require security, the order must be made:
ExplanationSection 112 requires a written order specifying the substance of the information received, the bond amount, its duration, and the number/character/class of sureties required — a procedural safeguard against arbitrary security demands.
-
Question 280 of 300
Section 50 provides that a person under arrest shall not be subjected to:
ExplanationSection 50 sets a proportionality standard for physical restraint during arrest — restraint is permitted, but must not exceed what escape-prevention genuinely requires.
-
Question 281 of 300
Under Section 164(3), where the person making a statement declares he does not wish to confess, the Magistrate must:
ExplanationSection 164(3) protects genuine voluntariness by requiring the Magistrate to respect an explicit refusal to confess — while still allowing him to record whatever non-confessional statement the person does choose to make.
-
Question 282 of 300
Under Section 236, if a single act or series of acts is of such a nature that it is doubtful which of several offences the facts constitute, the accused may be charged with:
ExplanationSection 236 accommodates genuine legal uncertainty at the charging stage — allowing multiple or alternative charges rather than forcing prosecutors to guess wrong and lose the case on a technicality.
-
Question 283 of 300
Under Section 14, a Special Judicial Magistrate is appointed by the Provincial Government on the recommendation of the:
ExplanationSection 14 requires High Court recommendation before a Special Judicial Magistrate can be appointed to exercise judicial-Magistrate powers over particular cases or classes of cases.
-
Question 284 of 300
Section 145 applies where a dispute concerning land or water likely to cause a breach of the peace exists, and empowers the Magistrate to:
ExplanationSection 145's crucial limitation — a favorite exam point — is that the Magistrate decides possession only, expressly not the question of legal title, which remains a matter for civil courts.
-
Question 285 of 300
Section 516-A empowers a Court to make an order for the custody and disposal of property produced before it, pending:
ExplanationSection 516-A allows interim custody/disposal orders for property (e.g., perishables or property needing safekeeping) while the underlying criminal matter is still pending, rather than leaving it in limbo until final judgment.
-
Question 286 of 300
Section 107 empowers a Magistrate to require security for keeping the peace from a person who, in the Magistrate's opinion, is likely to:
ExplanationSection 107 is the general (non-conviction-based) security-for-peace provision, triggered where the Magistrate has information that a person is likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb public tranquility.
-
Question 287 of 300
Under Section 417(1), the Provincial Government may direct the Public Prosecutor to present an appeal to the High Court from an order of:
ExplanationSection 417(1) allows the State, through the Public Prosecutor, to appeal an acquittal — the government-initiated route, distinct from Section 417(2)'s complainant-initiated special leave route.
-
Question 288 of 300
What is the status of the CrPC's original Chapter XVIII (Sections 206 to 220), which once governed inquiry into cases triable by the Court of Session or High Court?
ExplanationChapter XVIII, Sections 206-220, has been entirely omitted from Pakistan's CrPC — a useful distinguishing fact from the Indian CrPC 1973 (a different, separately-evolved code), which retains an active committal chapter using overlapping section numbers. Candidates who study Indian CrPC material by mistake often get this wrong.
-
Question 289 of 300
Under Section 353, evidence in an inquiry or trial must generally be taken in the presence of the accused, or, when his personal attendance is dispensed with, in the presence of:
ExplanationSection 353 requires evidence to be taken with the accused (or, when exempted from personal attendance, his pleader) present — Pakistani courts have held that examining witnesses in the accused's complete absence, without a proper exemption, can invalidate the trial.
-
Question 290 of 300
Under Section 99-G, any order passed or action taken under Section 99-A (forfeiture of publications) shall not be called into question in any Court:
ExplanationSection 99-G channels all challenges to a Section 99-A forfeiture order exclusively through the Section 99-B High Court application process — no alternative route (such as an ordinary civil suit) is available.
-
Question 291 of 300
Under Section 66, if a person in lawful custody escapes or is rescued, the person from whose custody he escaped may:
ExplanationSection 66 gives an immediate, nationwide pursuit-and-retake power upon escape or rescue from lawful custody, without needing to first obtain a new warrant.
-
Question 292 of 300
Pakistani superior courts have held that the phrase 'cannot give a satisfactory account of himself' (grounding action under Section 109/55) refers to:
ExplanationPakistani case law (e.g., State v. Abdul Karim, PLD 1964 Kar. 384) has clarified that a momentary or isolated failure to satisfactorily explain one's conduct at a particular time and place does not, by itself, justify action under this provision — a genuinely continuing pattern is required.
-
Question 293 of 300
Under Section 1(1), the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 came into force on:
ExplanationSection 1(1) states the Code came into force on the first day of July 1898 — though it was enacted (assented to) on 22 March 1898. The commencement date and the enactment date are different and both testable.
-
Question 294 of 300
Under Section 59(1), a private person may arrest, without unnecessary delay handing him over to police, any person who in his view commits:
ExplanationSection 59(1) restricts private-person arrest powers to non-bailable cognizable offences committed in the arrester's presence, or arresting a proclaimed offender.
-
Question 295 of 300
Under Section 22-A, a Justice of the Peace, for the purpose of making an arrest within their local area, has all the powers of a:
ExplanationSection 22-A grants a Justice of the Peace the same arrest powers within their area as an ordinary police officer under Section 54 and a station house officer under Section 55.
-
Question 296 of 300
Section 498 gives the High Court or Court of Session a general power, in any case, to direct that any person be admitted to bail, or that bail already fixed be:
ExplanationSection 498 gives superior courts broad supervisory bail powers — including reducing bail amounts fixed by a police officer or Magistrate — and forms much of the statutory basis for pre-arrest ('anticipatory') bail practice in Pakistan.
-
Question 297 of 300
Under Section 497(1), a person accused of a non-bailable offence shall NOT be released on bail if there appear reasonable grounds for believing he is guilty of an offence punishable with:
ExplanationSection 497(1)'s prohibitory clause bars bail as of right where reasonable grounds link the accused to an offence carrying death, life imprisonment, or a ten-year term — though the section's provisos carve out specific exceptions (e.g., further inquiry, women/children/sick persons, prolonged trial delay).
-
Question 298 of 300
Where a cognizable offence occurred outside a police station's own territorial jurisdiction, Pakistani practice (drawing on Section 170's transfer mechanism) still requires the receiving station to:
ExplanationThe mandatory-registration principle applies regardless of territorial jurisdiction at the point of complaint — the receiving station registers the report (informally termed a 'zero FIR') and then transfers it onward under Section 170, rather than turning the complainant away.
-
Question 299 of 300
Section 149 imposes a duty on every police officer to interpose for the purpose of preventing, and may to the best of his ability prevent, the commission of:
ExplanationSection 149 establishes an active, not merely reactive, police duty: officers must proactively work to prevent cognizable offences, not simply respond after the fact.
-
Question 300 of 300
Under Section 63, a person arrested by police can be discharged only:
ExplanationSection 63 restricts the discharge of an arrested person to three specific routes: personal bond, bail, or a Magistrate's special order — preventing arbitrary release outside these channels.
0 / 300 answered
You can practise as a guest, but sign in to save your score and track your progress.