Prohibition-Order-1979-MCQs judiciary
69 questions
-
Question 1 of 69
Under Article 11, a non-Muslim who is NOT a citizen of Pakistan is liable to tazir for drinking only if it occurs:
ExplanationArticle 11(e) is narrower for non-citizen non-Muslims than for citizen non-Muslims: only public-place drinking attracts tazir for them, tying back to Article 2(l)'s definition of public place.
-
Question 2 of 69
Under Article 10(1)(a), hadd shall not be ENFORCED where drinking is proved only by confession, but the convict:
ExplanationThis mirrors the retraction rule found in the Zina and Offences Against Property Ordinances.
-
Question 3 of 69
Under Article 16(1), which offences under this Order are cognizable?
ExplanationArticle 16(1) makes Article 3 (manufacture/trafficking) cognizable outright, while Articles 4, 8 and 11 are cognizable only if committed at a public place.
-
Question 4 of 69
Under Article 16(2)(b), no Court shall take cognizance of an offence under Article 20 save on:
ExplanationArticle 20 concerns breach of licence conditions, and cognizance is confined to a Prohibition Officer's complaint.
-
Question 5 of 69
Under Article 8, drinking liable to hadd requires that the offender be:
ExplanationArticle 8 is narrower than Article 6's general definition of drinking in three ways: the offender must be an adult, a Muslim, and must take intoxicating liquor specifically by mouth.
-
Question 6 of 69
Under Article 21, the power to appoint an officer to exercise all the powers of a Collector, and to delegate powers to Prohibition Officers, is vested in:
ExplanationArticle 21 confirms that administration of the Order is a Provincial matter, consistent with the Provincial Government's role throughout Chapters II to IV.
-
Question 7 of 69
Under Article 33, which of the following Provincial enactments was repealed by the Prohibition Order, 1979?
ExplanationArticle 33 repeals five instruments: the Prohibition Act, 1977, and four Provincial Prohibition Ordinances of 1978 for Baluchistan, the North-West Frontier Province, the Punjab and Sind.
-
Question 8 of 69
Under Article 23, a Prohibition Officer has, in addition to the powers conferred by the Order, all the powers conferred on:
ExplanationArticle 23 specifically borrows the investigative powers relevant to COGNIZABLE offence investigation.
-
Question 9 of 69
Under Article 32, the Order does not apply to:
ExplanationArticle 32 is the standard saving clause used across the Hudood instruments of 1979.
-
Question 10 of 69
Under Article 10(2), in a case mentioned in Article 10(1), the Court may:
ExplanationArticle 10(2) offers retrial only - unlike the theft and haraabah provisions of the Offences Against Property Ordinance, there is no alternative tazir-on-the-record option here.
-
Question 11 of 69
How many enactments does Article 33 repeal?
ExplanationArticle 33 lists the Prohibition Act, 1977 and four Provincial Prohibition Ordinances of 1978, one for each of Baluchistan, the North-West Frontier Province, the Punjab and Sind.
-
Question 12 of 69
Under Article 9(b), the Court must be satisfied, having regard to the requirement of tazkiyah al-shuhood, that the witnesses:
ExplanationThis is the standard tazkiyah al-shuhood formula used consistently across the Hudood instruments for witness credibility.
-
Question 13 of 69
Under the second proviso to Article 4, the enhanced quantity threshold for opium or coca leaf is:
ExplanationThe word 'raw' before opium and coca leaf in this proviso was omitted by Act VI of 1994, widening its application to processed as well as raw forms.
-
Question 14 of 69
Under Article 7, drinking may be either:
ExplanationArticle 7 sets up the same hadd/tazir structure as theft and haraabah under the Offences Against Property Ordinance.
-
Question 15 of 69
Under the Explanation to Article 6, 'iztirar' in this Order means a situation in which a person is in apprehension of death due to extreme hunger or thirst, or:
ExplanationThe Prohibition Order's definition of iztirar is WIDER than the Offences Against Property Ordinance's - it adds 'serious illness' as a third ground, alongside hunger and thirst, reflecting the medicinal-use context of intoxicants.
-
Question 16 of 69
Under the second proviso to Article 27(1), an offence punishable under Article 8 is triable by:
ExplanationThis mirrors the exclusive Court-of-Session trial jurisdiction for hadd offences found across the Hudood instruments.
-
Question 17 of 69
The words extending the appeal-to-Federal-Shariat-Court route to sentences exceeding two years under ANY provision of the Order (not just Article 8) were inserted by:
ExplanationThe 1982 Amendment Order added this wider appeal route, matching the same two-year threshold used in the Offences Against Property Ordinance's appeal provision.
-
Question 18 of 69
Under the proviso to Article 8, the punishment of eighty stripes shall not be executed until:
ExplanationThe proviso also provides that, pending confirmation and execution, the convict is dealt with as if sentenced to simple imprisonment, subject to the Code of Criminal Procedure provisions on bail or suspension of sentence.
-
Question 19 of 69
Under Article 2(l), 'public place' includes a hotel, restaurant, motel, mess and club, but does NOT include:
ExplanationArticle 2(l) carves out an occupied hotel room from the definition, which matters directly for Article 11(e) - drinking by a non-Muslim foreigner is tazir only if it occurs at a public place.
-
Question 20 of 69
Under Article 12(2), a person contravening Article 12(1) - such as a police officer who arrests without following the medical-examination procedure - is punishable with imprisonment up to:
ExplanationArticle 12(2) is a check on police overreach in drinking-suspicion arrests, with its own separate penalty.
-
Question 21 of 69
Under the Schedule to the Order, referred to in Article 2(g), which of the following is expressly listed as an intoxicant?
ExplanationThe Schedule lists six items: hemp-plant leaves/tops (bhang etc.), charas, mixtures of the two, opium and its derivatives, coca leaf and its derivatives, and hashish.
-
Question 22 of 69
Under Article 2(o), 'tazir' means:
ExplanationThe tazir/hadd structure in this Order mirrors that of the Offences Against Property Ordinance and was likewise untouched by the Protection of Women Act, 2006, whose preamble names only the Zina and Qazf Ordinances.
-
Question 23 of 69
Under Article 15(2), where the offender under this Order is unknown or cannot be found, confiscation of the liable property is inquired into and determined by:
ExplanationArticle 15(2) provides an administrative, rather than judicial, route to confiscation in ownerless or unidentified-offender cases.
-
Question 24 of 69
Under Article 20, breach of a licence condition is punishable, in addition to cancellation or suspension of the licence and any other punishment, with imprisonment for life or not less than two years and fine, unless the holder proves that he:
ExplanationArticle 20 places a due-diligence burden on the licence-holder, and extends liability to any person who commits the breach, whether or not with the holder's permission.
-
Question 25 of 69
Under Article 19(2), the Collector SHALL cancel a licence if:
ExplanationArticle 19(2) is mandatory ('shall cancel'), in contrast to Article 19(1), which gives the Collector a discretionary power to cancel or suspend for non-payment of fees or breach of terms.
-
Question 26 of 69
Under Article 25, an attempt to commit an offence punishable under Article 8 is punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to:
ExplanationArticle 25 singles out attempted Article 8 (drinking liable to hadd) for a fixed two-year cap, while attempts to commit OTHER offences under the Order are punished at one-half of the longest term for the completed offence, or with whipping or fine, or a combination.
-
Question 27 of 69
Under Article 2(g), 'intoxicant' means an Article specified in the Schedule and includes intoxicating liquor and other Article or substance which:
ExplanationArticle 2(g) gives the Provincial Government a residual notification power to extend the definition beyond the Schedule and intoxicating liquor.
-
Question 28 of 69
Under the second proviso to Article 4, as inserted by the 1983 Amendment Order, an enhanced punishment of imprisonment for life or not less than two years applies where the intoxicant is heroin or cocaine and the quantity exceeds:
ExplanationTen grams is the enhanced threshold for heroin or cocaine; the threshold for opium or coca leaf is one kilogram under the same proviso.
-
Question 29 of 69
Under Article 22(1), a search warrant for intoxicants or apparatus may be issued by a Collector, Prohibition Officer or Magistrate where he has reason to believe an offence under:
ExplanationArticle 22(1) confines the search-warrant power to the four principal substantive offences.
-
Question 30 of 69
The word 'raw', which had qualified 'opium' and 'coca leaf' in the second proviso to Article 4, was omitted by:
ExplanationAct VI of 1994 removed 'raw' in two places in the proviso, so that the enhanced penalty is no longer confined to unprocessed opium or coca leaf.
-
Question 31 of 69
Under Article 6, a person is guilty of drinking if he intentionally, and without ikrah or iztirar, takes an intoxicant by any means whatsoever:
ExplanationArticle 6 is deliberately broad: actual intoxication is not an element of the offence, and 'by any means whatsoever' is not confined to oral ingestion (which is instead the specific requirement for HADD liability under Article 8).
-
Question 32 of 69
Under Article 9(a), drinking liable to hadd may be proved where the accused:
ExplanationArticle 9(a) requires a formal confession before a competent Court, unlike the mere guilty plea sufficient for theft under the Offences Against Property Ordinance.
-
Question 33 of 69
Under Article 19(3), on cancellation of a licence, the holder must at once declare to the Collector his stock of intoxicating liquor and:
ExplanationArticle 19(3) requires both declaration and Collector-directed disposal, rather than simple destruction or surrender.
-
Question 34 of 69
Under Article 9(b), how many witnesses are required to prove drinking liable to hadd by testimony?
ExplanationTwo witnesses matches the standard for theft and qazf, rather than the four required for zina.
-
Question 35 of 69
Under Article 13, an officer who vexatiously and unnecessarily delays forwarding an arrested person or seized article to a prohibition officer is punishable with fine which may extend to:
ExplanationArticle 13's fine of up to one thousand rupees is twice the maximum fine in Article 12(2).
-
Question 36 of 69
The provisos to Article 27(1) conferring exclusive Court of Session trial jurisdiction and the appeal route were originally inserted by:
ExplanationThe 1980 Amendment Order (P.O. No. 5 of 1980) first inserted these provisos into Article 27(1); the 1982 Order then widened the appeal route further.
-
Question 37 of 69
Under Article 26(1), which provisions of the Pakistan Penal Code apply mutatis mutandis to offences under this Order?
ExplanationArticle 26(1) uses the same broad combination as the Zina and Qazf Ordinances, in contrast to the Offences Against Property Ordinance, which additionally imports section 149 (unlawful assembly).
-
Question 38 of 69
Under Article 11, the punishment for drinking liable to tazir is imprisonment which may extend to three years, or:
ExplanationArticle 11's tazir punishment allows imprisonment, whipping, or both - the Court is not confined to one or the other.
-
Question 39 of 69
Under Article 3(1), as inserted by the 1983 Amendment Order, importing, exporting, transporting, manufacturing or processing an intoxicant is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to five years and:
ExplanationArticle 3(1) sets the general manufacture/trafficking offence; the whole of Article 3 was inserted by the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) (Amendment) Order, 1983 (P.O. No. 12 of 1983).
-
Question 40 of 69
Under Article 26(2), a person guilty of the abetment of an offence liable to hadd under this Order is liable to:
ExplanationThis is the same abetment-as-tazir formula found across all the Hudood instruments.
-
Question 41 of 69
Under Article 30, the Presiding Officer of the Court trying a case or hearing an appeal under this Order shall be a Muslim:
ExplanationArticle 30 matches the equivalent provisions in the Zina and Offences Against Property instruments, and differs from the Qazf Ordinance's Article 18, which has no such proviso.
-
Question 42 of 69
Under Article 12(1), a police officer may not detain or arrest a person on suspicion of drinking unless the person:
ExplanationArticle 12(1) is a procedural safeguard requiring medical examination (or refusal of it) as a precondition to detention or arrest on suspicion of drinking.
-
Question 43 of 69
The Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 is which instrument of 1979?
ExplanationUnlike the other Hudood instruments, which are Ordinances, this one is a President's Order - P.O. No. 4 of 1979.
-
Question 44 of 69
Under Article 2(d) and Article 2(n), 'buy' or 'buying' and 'sale' or 'selling' are both defined to include:
ExplanationBoth definitions are drafted to catch gratuitous transfers, not merely commercial sale and purchase, closing an obvious evasion route.
-
Question 45 of 69
Under Article 2(a), 'adult' for the purposes of this Order means a person who has attained:
ExplanationArticle 2(a) uses the same single eighteen-or-puberty threshold as the Offences Against Property Ordinance, without a male/female distinction.
-
Question 46 of 69
Under Article 27(4), the provisions of Chapter XXIX of the Code of Criminal Procedure do not apply to the punishment awarded under:
ExplanationArticle 27(4) confines the Chapter XXIX exclusion to the hadd punishment for drinking under Article 8, not to tazir punishments elsewhere in the Order.
-
Question 47 of 69
Under Article 14, in any case in which an offence has been committed under the Order, which of the following is liable to confiscation?
ExplanationArticle 14 extends confiscation beyond the intoxicant itself to the apparatus of the offence and the means used to hold or carry it.
-
Question 48 of 69
Under Article 17, licences for bona fide medicinal, scientific, industrial or similar purposes, or for religious-ceremony or export use, may be issued by:
ExplanationArticle 17 is the licensing gateway underlying the Article 5 saving provision.
-
Question 49 of 69
Under Article 4, mere ownership, possession or custody of an intoxicant is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to:
ExplanationArticle 4's base penalty for simple possession is lower than Article 3's penalty for manufacture or trafficking.
-
Question 50 of 69
Under Article 24, a person previously convicted of an offence under this Order who commits that offence again is, for the subsequent offence, awarded:
ExplanationArticle 24 provides for enhanced punishment upon repeat conviction, similar in spirit to the escalating scheme for theft under the Offences Against Property Ordinance, though structured differently.
-
Question 51 of 69
Under Article 5, the offences in Article 3 or Article 4 do not apply to any act done:
ExplanationArticle 5 is the general saving clause for licensed and otherwise authorised activity under Chapter III.
-
Question 52 of 69
Under Article 31(1), rules for carrying the Order into effect are made by:
ExplanationArticle 31 keeps rule-making at the Provincial level, consistent with the Order's overall administrative structure.
-
Question 53 of 69
Under the proviso to Article 15(2), no order of confiscation shall be made until the expiration of how many days from the date of seizure?
ExplanationThe proviso also requires that claimants be heard and permitted to produce supporting evidence before the fifteen-day period expires.
-
Question 54 of 69
Under Article 28, no suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against a Provincial Government, police officer, Prohibition Officer or other officer in respect of anything:
ExplanationArticle 28 is a standard good-faith indemnity clause.
-
Question 55 of 69
Under Article 27(3), which provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure do NOT apply to the punishment of whipping awarded under this Order?
ExplanationThis mirrors the identical exclusion found in the Zina, Qazf and Offences Against Property instruments.
-
Question 56 of 69
Under Article 16(2)(a), no Court shall take cognizance of an offence under Article 12 or Article 13 save on:
ExplanationArticle 16(2)(a) restricts cognizance of these procedural-abuse offences to complaints from the person who was wrongly detained or whose forwarding was delayed.
-
Question 57 of 69
Under Article 10(1)(b), hadd shall not be enforced where drinking is proved by testimony, but before execution a witness resiles so as to reduce the number of witnesses to fewer than:
ExplanationThe threshold of two matches the number of witnesses required to prove drinking liable to hadd under Article 9(b).
-
Question 58 of 69
Under Article 2(h), 'intoxicating liquor' includes toddy, spirits of wine, wine and beer, and all liquids consisting of or containing alcohol normally used for intoxication, but does NOT include:
ExplanationArticle 2(h) draws a form-based distinction: liquefying a solid intoxicant does not turn it into intoxicating liquor for the purposes of the Order.
-
Question 59 of 69
Under Article 11, which of the following is liable to tazir for drinking?
ExplanationArticle 11 lists three categories liable to tazir: a Muslim whose drinking is not liable to hadd or cannot be proved to hadd standard; a non-Muslim citizen drinking otherwise than as part of a religious ceremony; and a non-Muslim foreigner drinking at a PUBLIC PLACE.
-
Question 60 of 69
Under Article 15(1), a Court deciding a case involving property liable to confiscation may order such confiscation:
ExplanationArticle 15(1) detaches confiscation from conviction - an acquittal does not automatically bar an order of confiscation.
-
Question 61 of 69
Under Article 22(2), a person executing a search warrant may detain, search and arrest a person found in the place searched, subject to:
ExplanationArticle 22(2) ties arrest during a search back to the medical-examination safeguard in Article 12(1).
-
Question 62 of 69
Under Article 3(2), importing, exporting, transporting, manufacturing or trafficking in opium or coca leaf or their derivatives, or financing such activity, is punishable with:
ExplanationArticle 3(2) singles out opium and coca leaf trafficking (and its financing) for the heaviest tazir punishment in the Order, mirroring the Article 4 enhancement for the same substances.
-
Question 63 of 69
Under Article 8, the punishment for drinking liable to hadd is whipping numbering:
ExplanationEighty stripes for drinking liable to hadd matches the hadd punishment for qazf, and is lower than the hundred stripes for zina by a non-muhsan.
-
Question 64 of 69
Under Article 1(3), the Prohibition Order came into force on:
ExplanationCommencement is fixed at the twelfth day of Rabi-ul-Awwal, 1399 Hijri, that is, 10 February 1979, the same commencement date used across the Hudood instruments of that year.
-
Question 65 of 69
Under the Explanation to Article 6, 'ikrah' means:
ExplanationThis definition of ikrah in Article 6 is textually identical to the definition in the Offences Against Property Ordinance's section 10(g) Explanation.
-
Question 66 of 69
Under the first proviso to Article 4, the possession offence does NOT apply to:
ExplanationThe proviso is narrowly drawn: it protects religious-ceremony use by non-Muslims, not general possession by non-Muslims.
-
Question 67 of 69
Under the Schedule, opium and opium derivatives, and coca leaf and coca derivatives, are defined by reference to:
ExplanationThe Schedule cross-refers to the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 for the precise definitions of opium and coca derivatives, rather than defining them independently.
-
Question 68 of 69
Comparing the Prohibition Order with the Offences Against Property Ordinance on the retraction of a confession: under the Prohibition Order, retraction before execution of hadd allows the Court to:
ExplanationArticle 10(2) of the Prohibition Order offers only retrial, whereas section 11(2) and (3) of the Offences Against Property Ordinance offer retrial for confession-retraction and tazir-on-the-record for the other listed cases - a genuine structural difference between the two instruments.
-
Question 69 of 69
Under Article 29, this Order has effect:
ExplanationArticle 29 gives the Order overriding effect, in the same terms as Article 3 of the Offences Against Property Ordinance and the (now-omitted) section 3 of the Zina Ordinance.
0 / 69 answered
You can practise as a guest, but sign in to save your score and track your progress.