Logic Statements Assumptions Arguments Conclusions Competitive Exams
50 questions · IQ Logic and Reasoning
-
Question 1 of 50
Statement: Many students of the city schools are falling sick because of contaminated drinking water at their school. Courses of action: I. The school administration should immediately arrange safe drinking water. II. The students should be shifted to another city.
ExplanationSafe drinking water tackles the cause directly (I). Shifting all students to another city is impractical and extreme (II).
-
Question 2 of 50
Statement: Traffic police have decided to impose heavy fines on riders who do not wear helmets. Assumptions: I. All riders already wear helmets. II. The fear of fines can change riders' behaviour.
ExplanationThe decision assumes fines will influence behaviour (II). If all riders already wore helmets, there would be no need for the step, so I is not implicit.
-
Question 3 of 50
Statement: The number of internet users in the country doubled in the last five years. Conclusions: I. All people in the country use the internet. II. The use of the internet has become more common.
ExplanationDoubling users shows internet use became more common (II). It does not mean everyone uses it, so I does not follow.
-
Question 4 of 50
Statement: Only candidates with a master's degree can apply for this post. Assumptions: I. Candidates with a lower qualification are not suitable for the post. II. Honesty is the best policy.
ExplanationThe condition assumes that the required degree is needed for the work (I). The second idea has nothing to do with the statement.
-
Question 5 of 50
Argument: A new metro line will reduce traffic jams in the city. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
ExplanationIf most commuters will not use the metro, it will not reduce traffic. The other options do not affect traffic levels.
-
Question 6 of 50
Statement: Should the retirement age be raised? Arguments: I. Yes, experienced employees can continue to contribute. II. Yes, it will reduce the burden on pension funds.
ExplanationBoth give relevant and important reasons: experience is retained (I) and pension costs fall (II). Both are strong.
-
Question 7 of 50
Statement: In a survey, 70% of the residents said that they prefer public transport. Conclusions: I. The majority of residents prefer public transport. II. All residents use public transport every day.
Explanation70% is a majority, so I follows. A preference does not mean every resident uses it daily, so II does not follow.
-
Question 8 of 50
Statement: Should all schools have computer labs? Arguments: I. Yes, because computers are costly. II. Yes, because computer skills are essential for most jobs today.
ExplanationThe cost of computers is not a reason for installing them, so I is weak. II gives a strong, relevant reason.
-
Question 9 of 50
Statement: The government has announced a free vaccination drive for all children below five years. Assumptions: I. Children below five years are at risk of certain diseases. II. Parents will bring their children for vaccination.
ExplanationThe drive is launched because the children are at risk (I), and it works only if parents bring the children (II). Both are implicit.
-
Question 10 of 50
Claim: Eating nuts every day improves memory, because a group that ate nuts scored higher in a memory test. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the claim?
ExplanationExtra coaching offers another explanation for the higher scores, so it weakens the claim that nuts caused them.
-
Question 11 of 50
Statement: Should the government ban mobile phones? Arguments: I. Yes, because phones are costly. II. No, because many people own them.
ExplanationCost alone is not a good reason for a ban, and ownership by many people is not a strong reason against it. Both are weak.
-
Question 12 of 50
Argument: Sales rose after the company reduced its prices, so the price cut caused the increase in sales. Which assumption does the argument depend on?
ExplanationTo claim that the price cut was the cause, the argument assumes nothing else of importance explains the rise in sales.
-
Question 13 of 50
Statement: A train leaves station A at 6 pm and reaches station B at 11 pm on the same day. Conclusions: I. The journey takes 5 hours. II. The train reaches station B on the same day it leaves station A.
ExplanationFrom 6 pm to 11 pm is 5 hours (I), and the statement itself says the arrival is on the same day (II). Both follow.
-
Question 14 of 50
Statement: A notice at a hospital: 'Smoking is prohibited within the hospital premises.' Assumptions: I. Smoking harms the health of patients. II. People will obey the notice.
ExplanationThe ban is made because smoking is harmful (I), and a notice is useful only if people follow it (II). Both are implicit.
-
Question 15 of 50
Statement: The students of class X have performed poorly in Mathematics. Courses of action: I. Extra classes should be arranged for Mathematics. II. Mathematics should be removed from the syllabus.
ExplanationExtra classes can improve results (I). Removing the subject does not solve the problem (II).
-
Question 16 of 50
Statement: The teacher asked the students to read the chapter before tomorrow's class. Assumptions: I. Students will read the chapter if they are asked to. II. Every student has a copy of the book.
ExplanationThe instruction assumes students will follow it (I). It does not assume that every single student owns the book, so II is not implicit.
-
Question 17 of 50
Statement: The water level in the dam has fallen drastically. Courses of action: I. People should be advised to use water carefully. II. The government should look for additional water sources.
ExplanationSaving water (I) and finding new sources (II) are both practical steps. Both follow.
-
Question 18 of 50
Statement: The bank has increased the interest rate on fixed deposits. Assumptions: I. Customers dislike earning interest. II. The bank will close down next year.
ExplanationNeither idea is behind the decision. The bank raises rates to attract deposits, not because customers dislike interest or the bank is closing.
-
Question 19 of 50
Statement: Should the government ban fireworks? Arguments: I. Yes, because they are loud. II. No, because fireworks are colourful.
ExplanationNeither argument is serious or important enough. Loudness alone is a minor reason for a ban and colour is irrelevant to the decision.
-
Question 20 of 50
Statement: Should the government provide free electricity to everyone? Arguments: I. Yes, because everyone likes free things. II. No, because it would put a very heavy burden on the treasury.
ExplanationLiking free things is not a valid reason, so I is weak. The financial burden is a strong objection, so II is strong.
-
Question 21 of 50
Statement: The library is open from 9 am to 5 pm on weekdays. Conclusions: I. A person can visit the library at noon on a Tuesday. II. The library is open at night on weekdays.
ExplanationNoon on a Tuesday falls within the opening hours, so I follows. Night is outside 9 am to 5 pm, so II does not follow.
-
Question 22 of 50
Statement: Honesty is the best policy; do not cheat in exams. Assumptions: I. Cheating is always discovered. II. Every student cheats.
ExplanationThe advice does not assume that cheating is always caught or that all students cheat. Neither assumption is implicit.
-
Question 23 of 50
Sales of umbrellas rose this year although the rainfall decreased. Which of the following best explains this?
ExplanationA sharp fall in price can raise sales even when rainfall falls, which resolves the apparent contradiction. The other options do not explain the rise.
-
Question 24 of 50
Statement: The company's profit has declined in the last two quarters. Conclusions: I. The company will shut down soon. II. The company's profit was higher before.
ExplanationA decline means the earlier profit was higher, so II follows. Closing down is an extreme guess, so I does not follow.
-
Question 25 of 50
Statement: Sana is a doctor in the city hospital. All the doctors in the city hospital were trained abroad. Conclusions: I. Sana was trained abroad. II. At least one person who works in the city hospital was trained abroad.
ExplanationSana is a doctor there, so she was trained abroad (I). That also means at least one person in the hospital was trained abroad (II). Both follow.
-
Question 26 of 50
Statement: Should marks in examinations be replaced by grades? Arguments: I. Yes, it reduces unhealthy competition and stress. II. Yes, because grades look nicer.
ExplanationI gives a relevant benefit, so it is strong. Appearance is not a serious reason, so II is weak.
-
Question 27 of 50
Statement: Pakistan's literacy rate rose from 58% in 2010 to 62% in 2020. Conclusions: I. The literacy rate improved over the decade. II. The literacy rate was lower in 2010 than in 2020.
ExplanationBoth state the same fact: 58% in 2010 is lower than 62% in 2020. Both follow.
-
Question 28 of 50
Statement: Many people are not paying their electricity bills. Courses of action: I. Electricity should be supplied free of charge. II. All consumers should be punished.
ExplanationFree electricity is not practical, and punishing all consumers is unfair since many pay. Neither course follows.
-
Question 29 of 50
Statement: Only the members of the club are allowed to use the swimming pool. Hamza is using the swimming pool. Conclusions: I. Hamza is a member of the club. II. Hamza is not a member of the club.
ExplanationOnly members may use the pool and Hamza is using it, so he must be a member. I follows and II does not.
-
Question 30 of 50
Statement: Should the use of plastic be discouraged? Arguments: I. Yes, because it is light. II. Yes, because it does not decompose and pollutes land and water.
ExplanationBeing light is not a reason to discourage plastic, so I is weak. Pollution and non-decomposition is a strong reason, so II is strong.
-
Question 31 of 50
Statement: A bridge in the town has developed cracks. Courses of action: I. The bridge should be demolished immediately without any plan. II. Traffic on the bridge should be restricted and engineers should examine the cracks.
ExplanationRestricting traffic and an expert inspection is a safe and sensible response (II). Immediate demolition without a plan is rash (I).
-
Question 32 of 50
Statement: The price of petrol has risen by 10% this month, while salaries remain unchanged. Conclusions: I. Salaries will increase next month. II. The cost of living may rise for salaried people.
ExplanationNothing indicates a future salary rise, so I does not follow. Higher fuel prices with fixed income may raise living costs, so II follows.
-
Question 33 of 50
Statement: All the shops in the market remain closed on Sunday. Today is Monday. Conclusions: I. The shops are open today. II. The shops will be closed tomorrow.
ExplanationThe statement gives no information about Monday or Tuesday, so neither conclusion can be drawn.
-
Question 34 of 50
Statement: Ali scored more than Bilal in Mathematics. Bilal scored more than Chand. Conclusions: I. Ali scored more than Chand. II. Chand scored the least among the three.
ExplanationAli > Bilal > Chand, so Ali scored more than Chand (I) and Chand scored the least (II). Both follow.
-
Question 35 of 50
Statement: All the employees who completed the training were promoted. Rahim was promoted. Conclusions: I. Rahim completed the training. II. Rahim did not complete the training.
ExplanationThe statement does not say that only trained employees were promoted, so neither conclusion is certain individually. Together they cover both possibilities, so either I or II follows.
-
Question 36 of 50
Statement: The manager told the staff, 'Submit your reports by Friday to avoid delay in the audit.' Assumptions: I. The audit cannot be postponed under any condition. II. Delay in submitting reports can delay the audit.
ExplanationThe warning assumes late reports can delay the audit (II). Nothing in the statement says the audit can never be postponed, so I is not implicit.
-
Question 37 of 50
Statement: The Education Department has extended the last date of admissions so that no student is left out. Assumptions: I. Students will not apply after the extended date. II. Some students have not yet been admitted.
ExplanationThe extension assumes some students are still not admitted (II). The step is meant to let students apply later, so I is not implicit.
-
Question 38 of 50
Statement: Some pens in the box are blue. Conclusions: I. All the pens in the box are blue. II. Some pens in the box are not blue.
ExplanationThe statement does not settle whether every pen is blue, so neither follows individually. 'All are blue' and 'Some are not blue' are opposites and one of them must be true, so either I or II follows.
-
Question 39 of 50
Statement: Should school hours be shortened? Arguments: I. Yes, children will have more time for play and rest. II. No, because teachers will have less work.
ExplanationI gives a relevant benefit to children. Teachers' workload is not the concern of this question, so II is weak.
-
Question 40 of 50
Statement: Should the advertising of junk food be banned near schools? Arguments: I. Yes, it influences children towards unhealthy eating habits. II. No, because children like junk food.
ExplanationArgument I gives a relevant and important reason (children's health). Argument II is only about preference, so it is weak.
-
Question 41 of 50
Statement: The government has banned plastic bags in the city from next month. Assumptions: I. Alternatives to plastic bags are available. II. Plastic bags harm the environment.
ExplanationThe ban is practical only if alternatives exist (I), and it is justified by environmental harm (II). Both are implicit.
-
Question 42 of 50
Argument: Schools should start later in the morning because teenagers need more sleep. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
ExplanationEvidence that more sleep improves performance supports the claim that a later start helps students. The other options do not show any benefit to students.
-
Question 43 of 50
Statement: Should cigarette smoking be banned in public places? Arguments: I. Yes, passive smoking harms non-smokers. II. Yes, it will encourage smokers to smoke less.
ExplanationProtecting non-smokers (I) and reducing smoking (II) are both relevant and important. Both are strong.
-
Question 44 of 50
All athletes in the team train daily. Zubair does not train daily. Which conclusion is valid?
ExplanationEvery team athlete trains daily. Since Zubair does not, he cannot be one of them.
-
Question 45 of 50
Statement: Many farmers have lost their crops because of floods. Courses of action: I. The government should provide relief aid to the affected farmers. II. Flood control systems should be improved.
ExplanationRelief helps the victims now (I) and better flood control prevents future losses (II). Both are sensible.
-
Question 46 of 50
Statement: Please use the helpline number given on the card for any query. Assumptions: I. The card holders have access to a phone. II. The helpline staff will solve every query.
ExplanationUsing the helpline needs a phone, so I is implicit. The statement does not assume that every query will be solved, so II is not implicit.
-
Question 47 of 50
Statement: Advertisement: 'Use Brand Z toothpaste for healthy teeth.' Assumptions: I. All people use the same brand of toothpaste. II. Brand Z is cheaper than every other brand.
ExplanationThe advertisement does not rely on either idea. It does not assume that everyone uses one brand or that Brand Z is the cheapest.
-
Question 48 of 50
Statement: Rainfall in the northern region was above average this year. Conclusions: I. There will be floods in the northern region. II. Crop production in the northern region increased.
ExplanationAbove-average rainfall does not certainly cause floods or higher crop production, so neither conclusion follows.
-
Question 49 of 50
Statement: The library of a college has very few books in some subjects. Courses of action: I. The library should be closed. II. The college should purchase books in those subjects.
ExplanationBuying books solves the shortage (II). Closing the library makes the problem worse (I).
-
Question 50 of 50
Statement: A fire broke out in a factory because of a short circuit. Courses of action: I. The electrical wiring of all factories should be inspected. II. All factories should be shut permanently.
ExplanationInspecting wiring prevents similar fires (I). Permanently closing all factories is an extreme reaction (II).
0 / 50 answered · 0 skipped
You can practise as a guest, but sign in to save your score and track your progress.