Constitution-of-Pakistan-1973-Batch-4-of-5 Judiciary
62 questions · Judiciary
-
Question 1 of 62
Under Article 179, an ordinary Judge of the Supreme Court holds office until age:
ExplanationArticle 179 fixes the retirement age for Supreme Court Judges at sixty-five — notably lower than the Federal Constitutional Court's retirement age of sixty-eight under Article 175I.
-
Question 2 of 62
Under Article 225, an election to a seat in Parliament or a Provincial Assembly may be challenged:
ExplanationArticle 225 channels election disputes exclusively into the election-petition process prescribed by law (heard by Election Tribunals), rather than through ordinary civil litigation or writ jurisdiction.
-
Question 3 of 62
Under Article 203E(4), a party before the Federal Shariat Court may be represented by a legal practitioner who is a Muslim, enrolled as a High Court advocate for at least how many years, or alternatively by:
ExplanationArticle 203E(4) allows representation either by a Muslim advocate with at least five years' High Court enrolment (or a Supreme Court advocate), or by a jurisconsult — an Aalim well-versed in Shariat — drawn from the Court's own panel.
-
Question 4 of 62
Under Article 185(2)(d), a civil appeal lies to the Supreme Court as of right if the value of the dispute is not less than:
ExplanationArticle 185(2)(d)'s monetary threshold was raised by the 26th Amendment (2024) from fifty thousand rupees to one million rupees for an as-of-right civil appeal.
-
Question 5 of 62
Under Article 228(2), the Council of Islamic Ideology shall consist of not less than eight and not more than how many members?
ExplanationArticle 228(2), as amended, sets the Council's membership at not less than eight and not more than twenty members (the upper limit was raised from an original fifteen).
-
Question 6 of 62
Under Article 209, Explanation I, who chairs the Supreme Judicial Council?
ExplanationArticle 209(2), Explanation I mirrors the same chairmanship rule used for the Judicial Commission: the more senior of the two Chief Justices (FCC and Supreme Court) chairs the Supreme Judicial Council.
-
Question 7 of 62
Under Article 199(1)(b)(i), the writ enabling a High Court to examine whether a person's detention is lawful is commonly known as:
ExplanationArticle 199(1)(b)(i) is the constitutional basis for habeas corpus in Pakistan — directing that a detained person be brought before the Court to determine whether the detention is lawful.
-
Question 8 of 62
Under Article 209(2), as amended by the 27th Amendment (2025), the Supreme Judicial Council's membership now includes Chief Justices/Judges from BOTH:
ExplanationArticle 209(2), rewritten by the 27th Amendment, now draws members from both the FCC and Supreme Court (their Chief Justices, one senior Judge each, plus a jointly-nominated member) in addition to the two most senior High Court Chief Justices — a significant expansion from the older Supreme-Court-only composition.
-
Question 9 of 62
Under Article 198(3), the Lahore High Court is required to have Benches at:
ExplanationArticle 198(3) names the mandatory Bench locations for each High Court; for the Lahore High Court, these are Bahawalpur, Multan and Rawalpindi.
-
Question 10 of 62
Under Article 175A(3), notwithstanding the general rule, the first Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court was to be appointed by the President from amongst:
ExplanationArticle 175A(3)'s second proviso required the President, on the Prime Minister's advice, to appoint the very first Chief Justice of the FCC from amongst the sitting Judges of the Supreme Court — a one-time transitional rule.
-
Question 11 of 62
Under Article 209(5), as amended by the 27th Amendment, grounds for Council inquiry into a Judge now include all of the following EXCEPT:
ExplanationArticle 209(5) lists incapacity, inefficiency (added by the 26th/27th Amendments), misconduct, and (per clause (iv)) not accepting an Article 200 transfer, as grounds for inquiry — mere political disagreement is not a constitutional ground.
-
Question 12 of 62
Under Article 203C, Ulema Judges of the Federal Shariat Court must have at least how many years of experience in Islamic law, research or instruction?
ExplanationArticle 203C requires Ulema Judges (of whom there may be not more than three) to have at least fifteen years of experience in Islamic law, research, or instruction.
-
Question 13 of 62
Under Article 199(1)(b)(ii), the power to require a public office-holder to show under what authority he holds that office corresponds to the writ of:
ExplanationArticle 199(1)(b)(ii) is Pakistan's constitutional basis for quo warranto — challenging a person's authority to hold a public office.
-
Question 14 of 62
Under Article 207(3), a person who has held office as a permanent Judge of the Federal Constitutional Court or Supreme Court is permanently barred from:
ExplanationArticle 207(3)(a) imposes a lifetime bar: a former permanent Judge of the FCC or Supreme Court may never plead or act in any court or before any authority in Pakistan.
-
Question 15 of 62
Under Article 214, the Chief Election Commissioner takes his oath before:
ExplanationArticle 214 requires the Commissioner to take his oath before the Chief Justice of Pakistan; a member of the Election Commission takes theirs before the Commissioner.
-
Question 16 of 62
Under Article 228(1), the Council of Islamic Ideology was to be constituted within how many days of the commencing day?
ExplanationArticle 228(1) required the Council of Islamic Ideology to be constituted within ninety days of the commencing day (14 August 1973).
-
Question 17 of 62
Under Article 175A(3A), the Special Parliamentary Committee for Chief Justice nominations consists of how many total members?
ExplanationArticle 175A(3A), as amended by the 27th Amendment, fixes the Special Parliamentary Committee at twelve members: eight from the National Assembly and four from the Senate.
-
Question 18 of 62
Under Article 193(2), a person is qualified for High Court appointment if he is a citizen of Pakistan, not less than 40 years of age, and has been a High Court advocate for at least how many years, OR held judicial office for at least how many years?
ExplanationArticle 193(2), as substituted by the 26th Amendment (2024), requires ten years as a High Court advocate (route (a)) or ten years holding judicial office in Pakistan (route (b)) — this also dropped the separate civil-service/District Judge route that existed before 2024.
-
Question 19 of 62
Under Article 194, the Chief Justice of a Provincial High Court takes his oath before:
ExplanationArticle 194 requires a Provincial High Court's Chief Justice to take his oath before the Governor (unlike the Islamabad High Court's Chief Justice, who under the proviso takes his oath before the President).
-
Question 20 of 62
Under Article 199(3), a High Court's Article 199 powers generally do NOT extend to matters concerning:
ExplanationArticle 199(3) excludes Armed Forces members' service-related matters from ordinary High Court Article 199 relief — a long-standing carve-out preserving military justice separation.
-
Question 21 of 62
Under Article 189(2), as amended by the 27th Amendment, Supreme Court decisions on questions of law bind all other courts EXCEPT:
ExplanationArticle 189(2) now carves out the Federal Constitutional Court from the courts bound by Supreme Court precedent — reflecting the FCC's new position above the Supreme Court in constitutional matters. Article 189(1) makes FCC decisions binding on all courts, including the Supreme Court.
-
Question 22 of 62
Under Article 219, the Election Commission's duties include:
ExplanationArticle 219 lists a broad set of ECP responsibilities, including preparing and revising electoral rolls, organizing Senate elections and casual vacancies, and delimiting constituencies.
-
Question 23 of 62
Under Article 203C, the permanent seat of the Federal Shariat Court is at:
ExplanationThe Federal Shariat Court's principal seat is Islamabad, with Bench registries at Lahore, Karachi, Peshawar and Quetta accommodated within each Provincial High Court's premises.
-
Question 24 of 62
Under Article 203F, an appeal against certain Federal Shariat Court decisions lies to:
ExplanationArticle 203F provides for appeals from the Federal Shariat Court to the Supreme Court, historically heard by a Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court.
-
Question 25 of 62
Under Article 182, an ad hoc Judge may be requested from a former Supreme Court Judge only if, since ceasing to hold that office, less than how many years have elapsed?
ExplanationArticle 182(a) permits requesting a former Supreme Court Judge to sit as an ad hoc Judge only if fewer than three years have passed since he ceased holding that office.
-
Question 26 of 62
Under Article 226, elections to fill a seat in Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) or a Provincial Assembly (other than reserved seats) shall be held by:
ExplanationArticle 226 mandates secret ballot for general-seat elections to Parliament and Provincial Assemblies, a core safeguard for free and fair elections.
-
Question 27 of 62
Under Article 213(1), the Chief Election Commissioner is appointed by:
ExplanationArticle 213(1): 'There shall be a Chief Election Commissioner... who shall be appointed by the President,' now on the recommendation of a Parliamentary Committee process introduced by the 18th Amendment.
-
Question 28 of 62
Under Article 211, the Supreme Judicial Council's proceedings, its report to the President, and a Judge's removal under Article 209(6) are:
ExplanationArticle 211 completely ousts judicial review of Supreme Judicial Council proceedings, its report, and the resulting removal — a strong finality provision.
-
Question 29 of 62
Under Article 213(2), a person appointed Chief Election Commissioner must not be more than what age?
ExplanationArticle 213(2) sets the maximum age for CEC appointment at sixty-eight years, matching the age ceiling set by the 22nd Amendment (2016).
-
Question 30 of 62
Under Article 177(2)(a), a person is qualified for appointment as a Supreme Court Judge if he has been a High Court Judge for at least:
ExplanationArticle 177(2)(a) requires not less than five years (aggregate) as a High Court Judge as one qualifying route to the Supreme Court.
-
Question 31 of 62
Under Article 203C(2), the Federal Shariat Court consists of not more than how many Muslim Judges, including the Chief Justice?
ExplanationArticle 203C(2) caps the Federal Shariat Court at not more than eight Muslim Judges, including the Chief Justice, appointed by the President in accordance with Article 175A.
-
Question 32 of 62
Under Article 199(1A), inserted by the 26th Amendment (2024), a High Court:
ExplanationArticle 199(1A), like the parallel restriction once placed on the Supreme Court's Article 184(3), confirms a High Court cannot act suo motu — it may only act on the contents of an application actually filed before it.
-
Question 33 of 62
Under Article 222, the power to make provisions regulating electoral matters (subject to the Constitution) is vested in:
ExplanationArticle 222 empowers Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) to make law, subject to the Constitution, for matters relating to elections — the constitutional basis for the Elections Act, 2017.
-
Question 34 of 62
Under Article 195, a High Court Judge holds office until age:
ExplanationArticle 195, as amended by the 17th Amendment (2003), sets the High Court retirement age at sixty-five (raised from the earlier sixty-two).
-
Question 35 of 62
Under Article 209(6), as amended, the Council must generally report its findings within six months of a reference — except where the ground is refusal of an Article 200 transfer, in which case the deadline is:
ExplanationArticle 209(6)'s 27th Amendment addition sets a fast-track thirty-day deadline specifically for cases involving a Judge's refusal to accept a transfer under Article 200 — much shorter than the general six-month timeline.
-
Question 36 of 62
Article 202A, inserted by the 26th Amendment (2024), establishes:
ExplanationArticle 202A creates Constitutional Benches within each High Court; once in force for a given High Court, only those Benches — not ordinary Benches — may exercise the Court's Article 199 writ jurisdiction.
-
Question 37 of 62
Under Article 207(2), a former Judge of a superior court may not hold an office of profit in the service of Pakistan before the expiration of how many years after ceasing to hold office (with specific exceptions)?
ExplanationArticle 207(2) imposes a two-year 'cooling off' period before a former superior court Judge may take an office of profit in Pakistan's service — with named exceptions like judicial/quasi-judicial offices, Chief Election Commissioner, or the Council of Islamic Ideology.
-
Question 38 of 62
Under Article 218, the Election Commission's core duty is to organize and conduct elections in a manner that is:
ExplanationArticle 218(3) sets the Commission's mandate: to organize and conduct elections honestly, justly, fairly, in accordance with law, while guarding against corrupt practices.
-
Question 39 of 62
Under Article 215(1), the term of office for the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commission members is:
ExplanationArticle 215(1) fixes a five-year term for the CEC and the Commission's members, running from the day they enter office.
-
Question 40 of 62
Under Article 206(2), a High Court Judge who declines appointment to the Federal Constitutional Court or Supreme Court is:
ExplanationArticle 206(2), as amended by the 27th Amendment, treats a declined FCC/Supreme Court appointment as deemed retirement, preserving the Judge's pension based on his length of service.
-
Question 41 of 62
Under Article 212(1), Administrative Courts or Tribunals may be given exclusive jurisdiction over matters including:
ExplanationArticle 212(1)(a) allows the appropriate Legislature to create Administrative Courts/Tribunals with exclusive jurisdiction over Pakistan civil service terms, conditions, and disciplinary matters — such as Service Tribunals.
-
Question 42 of 62
Under Article 228(3)(b), the President must ensure that not less than how many Council members are, or have been, Judges of the Supreme Court or a High Court?
ExplanationArticle 228(3)(b) requires at least two Council members to be current or former Supreme Court or High Court Judges.
-
Question 43 of 62
Under Article 177(2)(b), a High Court advocate qualifies for Supreme Court appointment after practising for at least:
ExplanationArticle 177(2)(b) requires not less than fifteen years as a High Court advocate (who is also a Supreme Court advocate) as the alternative qualifying route.
-
Question 44 of 62
Under Article 200(1), as amended by the 27th Amendment (2025), a High Court Judge may be transferred to another High Court on the recommendation of:
ExplanationArticle 200(1), rewritten by the 27th Amendment, now channels High Court judge transfers through a recommendation of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan, with both High Courts' Chief Justices sitting as Commission members for that purpose.
-
Question 45 of 62
Under Article 227(3), Part IX's Islamic conformity requirement:
ExplanationArticle 227(3) is an explicit protective clause: nothing in Part IX affects the personal laws of non-Muslim citizens, nor their status as citizens of Pakistan.
-
Question 46 of 62
Under Article 175A(3E), meetings of the Special Parliamentary Committee are held:
ExplanationArticle 175A(3E) requires Committee meetings to be held in camera (privately), while still requiring the proceedings to be recorded.
-
Question 47 of 62
Under Article 200(4), a High Court Judge who does not accept a transfer must be proceeded against under Article 209 within:
ExplanationArticle 200(4) requires Supreme Judicial Council proceedings under Article 209 to begin within thirty days if a transferred Judge declines the transfer, and the Judge cannot perform functions until the Council decides.
-
Question 48 of 62
Under Article 203D, the standard the Federal Shariat Court applies is repugnancy to the Injunctions of Islam as laid down in:
ExplanationArticle 203D(1) anchors the FSC's repugnancy jurisdiction specifically to the Holy Quran and the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (PBUH).
-
Question 49 of 62
Under Article 227(1), all existing laws shall be brought into conformity with the Injunctions of Islam as laid down in:
ExplanationArticle 227(1) is the master repugnancy clause: all existing laws must conform to Islam's Injunctions as laid down in the Holy Quran and Sunnah, and no new repugnant law may be enacted.
-
Question 50 of 62
What happened to Article 184 (the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction over inter-governmental disputes and public-importance fundamental rights matters)?
ExplanationA critical, very recent fact: the 27th Amendment (2025) omitted Article 184 in its entirety. The original jurisdiction it once granted the Supreme Court — including the famous Article 184(3) public-interest/suo motu jurisdiction — now belongs exclusively to the Federal Constitutional Court under Article 175E.
-
Question 51 of 62
Under Article 227's Explanation, when applying this Article to the personal law of a Muslim sect, 'Quran and Sunnah' means:
ExplanationThe Explanation to Article 227(1) respects sectarian diversity: for personal law, 'Quran and Sunnah' means the Quran and Sunnah as that specific Muslim sect interprets them — relevant to Sunni/Shia divergence in personal law matters.
-
Question 52 of 62
What happened to Article 191A (Constitutional Benches of the Supreme Court), which had been inserted by the 26th Amendment in 2024?
ExplanationArticle 191A — which had created Constitutional Benches within the Supreme Court just one year earlier (26th Amendment, 2024) — was itself omitted by the 27th Amendment (2025), since that specialized constitutional jurisdiction was transferred wholesale to the newly created Federal Constitutional Court.
-
Question 53 of 62
Under Article 203E(6), a legal practitioner or jurisconsult appearing before the Federal Shariat Court is required to:
ExplanationArticle 203E(6) gives FSC advocacy a distinctive character: representatives don't simply plead a client's case but must expound the relevant Islamic Injunctions and submit a written interpretation to the Court.
-
Question 54 of 62
What happened to Article 186 (the Supreme Court's advisory jurisdiction)?
ExplanationArticle 186 (Presidential references for advisory opinions) was entirely omitted by the 27th Amendment; this jurisdiction now belongs to the Federal Constitutional Court under Article 175H.
-
Question 55 of 62
Under Article 203, a High Court's relationship to courts subordinate to it is one of:
ExplanationArticle 203: 'Each High Court shall supervise and control all courts subordinate to it' — the constitutional basis for the High Court's administrative authority over the lower judiciary.
-
Question 56 of 62
Under Article 212(3), an appeal from an Administrative Court or Tribunal to the Supreme Court lies only if:
ExplanationArticle 212(3) restricts Administrative Court/Tribunal appeals to Supreme Court leave-to-appeal cases involving a substantial question of law of public importance — not an automatic right of appeal.
-
Question 57 of 62
Under Article 204(1), as amended by the 27th Amendment, 'Court' for contempt purposes means:
ExplanationArticle 204(1) defines 'Court' for contempt jurisdiction as the Federal Constitutional Court or the Supreme Court, or a High Court — District and subordinate courts are not included under this specific Article.
-
Question 58 of 62
Under Article 203D(1), the Federal Shariat Court may examine whether a law is repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam:
ExplanationArticle 203D(1) gives the FSC broad access to this jurisdiction — it may act suo motu (of its own motion) or upon petition from a citizen, the Federal Government, or a Provincial Government.
-
Question 59 of 62
Under Article 175A(18)-(19), inserted by the 26th Amendment (2024), if a High Court Judge's annual performance evaluation remains unsatisfactory after an improvement period, the Commission refers the matter to the:
ExplanationArticle 175A(19) directs the Commission to send its report to the Supreme Judicial Council if a High Court Judge's performance remains unsatisfactory even after being given a period to improve — a new accountability mechanism from the 26th Amendment.
-
Question 60 of 62
Under the proviso to Article 179, inserted by the 26th Amendment (2024), the Chief Justice of Pakistan's term in that specific office is capped at:
ExplanationArticle 179's proviso, mirroring the FCC's Article 175I, caps the Chief Justice of Pakistan's tenure in that office at three years, after which he stands retired regardless of his age.
-
Question 61 of 62
A Judge of the Federal Shariat Court, other than the Chief Justice, normally holds that specific appointment for a term of:
ExplanationJudges of the Federal Shariat Court (other than permanently-appointed High Court Judges assigned there) typically serve a three-year term.
-
Question 62 of 62
Under Article 203G, decisions of the Federal Shariat Court on a matter within its jurisdiction are, subject to any Article 203F appeal:
ExplanationArticle 203G gives Federal Shariat Court decisions genuine binding force on the High Courts and subordinate courts, as well as on the Federal and Provincial Governments, once the Article 203F appeal process (if invoked) is exhausted.
0 / 62 answered
You can practise as a guest, but sign in to save your score and track your progress.
1 comment
Comments are closed on this post.