CrPC-1898-Batch-5-of-6-Sessions-Judgment-Execution judiciary
40 questions
-
Question 1 of 40
Under Section 339, a person to whom a pardon has been tendered and accepted is examined as a witness, and if the Court is later satisfied he has not made a full and true disclosure, he may be:
ExplanationSection 339 makes the pardon conditional on genuine, complete disclosure — if the approver reneges or lies, he loses the pardon's protection and faces prosecution both for the original offence and for perjury.
-
Question 2 of 40
Under Section 337, a tender of pardon may be made to an accomplice with a view to obtaining:
ExplanationSection 337 is the approver/accomplice-witness mechanism: a pardon is offered in exchange for full and true disclosure implicating other participants in the offence.
-
Question 3 of 40
Pakistani courts have clarified that general remissions announced by the Government on occasions like Independence Day or Eid (under Sections 401/402) are legally distinct from Presidential remissions, in that the former derive from:
ExplanationThe Sindh High Court clarified that routine occasion-based general remissions are a creature of statutory CrPC power (Sections 401/402) and prison rules, distinct from — and sometimes wrongly conflated with — the President's own separate constitutional remission power under Article 45.
-
Question 4 of 40
Pakistani case law confirms that mere silence of an accused, or his failure to make a statement on oath, does NOT by itself:
ExplanationThe Supreme Court (Amir Khatun v. Faiz Ahmed, PLD 1991 SC 787) held that an accused cannot be compelled to make a sworn statement, and that no adverse inference may be drawn purely from his choosing not to — consistent with the privilege against self-incrimination running throughout the Code.
-
Question 5 of 40
Under Section 341, where the accused does not understand the proceedings, the Court must:
ExplanationSection 341 protects the basic fairness of the trial by requiring genuine comprehension — mirroring Section 361's similar interpretation safeguard for evidence recording — rather than allowing proceedings to continue over an accused's head.
-
Question 6 of 40
Under Section 371, a copy of the judgment must be given to the accused, and in the case of a sentence of death, this requirement is treated with:
ExplanationSection 371 specifically addresses the death-sentence scenario for providing the accused a copy of the judgment, reflecting the heightened procedural care warranted by the sentence's finality.
-
Question 7 of 40
Pakistani case law has held that where there is a discrepancy in a material part of a principal witness's evidence between the vernacular record and an English record of the same testimony:
ExplanationBecause vernacular recording generally captures a witness's actual testimony more faithfully, a material discrepancy against an English record has been held to genuinely benefit the accused — reflecting the broader principle that ambiguity in the evidentiary record should not be resolved against him.
-
Question 8 of 40
Under Section 401, the power to suspend or remit a sentence, in whole or part, and either unconditionally or upon conditions, is vested in:
ExplanationSection 401 vests suspension/remission power in the appropriate Government (Provincial or Federal depending on the matter), separate from the judicial appeal or confirmation process.
-
Question 9 of 40
Under Section 374, a sentence of death passed by a Court of Session must be submitted to the:
ExplanationSection 374 requires every Sessions Court death sentence to go through mandatory High Court confirmation before execution — an automatic, non-optional safeguard that doesn't depend on the convict filing an appeal.
-
Question 10 of 40
Pakistani case law confirms that the President's power under Article 45 of the Constitution to commute a sentence is:
ExplanationThe Supreme Court (Bhai Khan, PLD 1992 SC 14) held that the President's Article 45 commutation power stands unrestricted — a notably broader authority than the Government's own statutory commutation power under Sections 401-402 of the CrPC, which is subject to specific procedural conditions.
-
Question 11 of 40
Under Section 366, judgment in every criminal trial must be pronounced:
ExplanationSection 366 requires open-Court pronouncement of judgment — a transparency safeguard, whether delivered immediately after the hearing concludes or at a later announced sitting.
-
Question 12 of 40
Section 386 addresses the direction of a warrant for the levy of a fine, permitting such a warrant to be directed to:
ExplanationSection 386 gives flexibility for fine-recovery: the Collector is the ordinary recipient of such a warrant, but a police officer or other suitable person may be used instead with proper sanction.
-
Question 13 of 40
Pakistani case law distinguishes an actual acquittal from a mere refusal to take cognizance, holding that:
ExplanationThe Supreme Court (Rana Muhammad Afzal Khan, PLD 1962 SC 397) clarified that Section 403's double-jeopardy bar requires a genuine acquittal on the facts — a court's mere refusal to take cognizance of a charge (for a separate legal reason) does not count as an acquittal and does not block a later trial.
-
Question 14 of 40
Under the Explanation to Section 344, a 'reasonable cause for remand' exists where sufficient evidence has been obtained to raise a suspicion the accused committed the offence, and:
ExplanationThe Explanation to Section 344 sets a two-part test for remand: existing evidence raising suspicion, PLUS a genuine likelihood that continued custody will actually yield further evidence — not remand as a routine default.
-
Question 15 of 40
Section 361 requires that where evidence is recorded in a language the accused does not understand, it must be:
ExplanationSection 361 safeguards a non-native-language-speaking accused's ability to follow the proceedings by requiring interpretation of the recorded evidence into a language he understands.
-
Question 16 of 40
Pakistani case law has held that postponing a case 'sine die' (indefinitely, without a fixed date) under Section 344 is:
ExplanationPakistani courts have held that Section 344 requires the Court to postpone proceedings to a fixed and definite date, not indefinitely — open-ended 'sine die' adjournment defeats the accused's right to a reasonably speedy resolution.
-
Question 17 of 40
Section 402-A specifically addresses:
ExplanationSection 402-A carves out death sentences for special treatment within the broader suspension/remission/commutation framework, reflecting the unique gravity and finality of capital punishment decisions.
-
Question 18 of 40
Under Section 353, evidence in an inquiry or trial must generally be taken in the presence of the accused, or, when his personal attendance is dispensed with, in the presence of:
ExplanationSection 353 requires evidence to be taken with the accused (or, when exempted from personal attendance, his pleader) present — Pakistani courts have held that examining witnesses in the accused's complete absence, without a proper exemption, can invalidate the trial.
-
Question 19 of 40
Under Section 368 (as it appears in the Judgment chapter), where the accused is convicted, the judgment must specify the offence and the section of the law under which he is convicted, and:
ExplanationA convicting judgment must clearly state both the specific offence/section of conviction and the actual sentence imposed — leaving no ambiguity about what the accused has been found guilty of and what punishment follows.
-
Question 20 of 40
Under Section 345, certain offences under the Pakistan Penal Code may be compounded (settled) by the parties, in some cases requiring:
ExplanationSection 345 lists compoundable offences in a table — some compoundable freely between the parties, others only with the Court's permission — and the effect of a valid composition is acquittal of the accused.
-
Question 21 of 40
Pakistani case law has held that a judgment must be recorded, dated, and signed at the time it is pronounced, meaning:
ExplanationPakistani courts have treated Sections 366-367's recording requirements as substantive, not merely formal — a judgment that is orally announced but never properly written and signed is legally inoperative and can be declared void by the High Court.
-
Question 22 of 40
Under Section 356, in trials before a Court of Session (and other cases falling outside Section 355), the evidence of each witness must be taken down:
ExplanationSection 356 requires fuller, narrative-style evidence recording than the memorandum approach in Section 355 — reflecting the greater seriousness and complexity of Sessions Court proceedings.
-
Question 23 of 40
Under Section 355, in cases tried by First and Second Class Magistrates, the Magistrate must, as the case proceeds, prepare a memorandum of the substance of the evidence, ordinarily:
ExplanationSection 355 requires the Magistrate personally to prepare the evidence memorandum in writing as the case proceeds; Pakistani courts have held that failing to keep this personally-made memorandum is an irregularity, though one that may be curable under Section 537 rather than automatically fatal.
-
Question 24 of 40
Pakistani case law has held that where an accused's Section 342 statement is not signed or thumb-marked in accordance with the mandatory requirements of Section 364, this defect is:
ExplanationBecause Section 364's signing/attestation requirements are treated as mandatory, not merely directory, non-compliance has been held to be a genuine illegality — not a curable irregularity — requiring the accused's statement to be properly re-recorded.
-
Question 25 of 40
Under Section 403(1), a person once tried by a competent Court and convicted or acquitted of an offence shall not, while that conviction or acquittal remains in force, be:
ExplanationSection 403(1) is the CrPC's double jeopardy ('autrefois acquit'/'autrefois convict') protection — barring retrial for the same offence or a substantially fact-overlapping different offence, subject to limited statutory exceptions (e.g., where the earlier court lacked competence to try the more serious later charge).
-
Question 26 of 40
Under Section 340, a person against whom proceedings are instituted under the Code is entitled to be defended by a pleader, and is himself:
ExplanationSection 340 combines two rights: representation by a pleader, and — importantly — the accused's own competency to testify as a defence witness, though (consistent with the privilege against self-incrimination) he cannot be compelled to do so.
-
Question 27 of 40
Section 343 provides that, except as provided in Sections 337 and 338 (tender of pardon), no influence by means of a promise, threat, or otherwise shall be used to an accused person to induce him to:
ExplanationSection 343 is a general integrity safeguard for the criminal process — outside the specific, regulated pardon mechanism of Sections 337-338, no one may pressure an accused (through promises or threats) into either revealing or concealing what he knows.
-
Question 28 of 40
Under Section 402, the power to commute a sentence to any less severe form of punishment lies with:
ExplanationSection 402 gives the Government the power to commute a sentence to a lesser form of punishment — distinct from an appellate court altering a sentence, and separate from Presidential clemency under Article 45 of the Constitution.
-
Question 29 of 40
Under Section 379, procedure in cases submitted to the High Court for confirmation of a death sentence requires the case to be heard by a Bench of:
ExplanationSection 379 mandates a multi-Judge Bench (at least two) for death-sentence confirmation hearings, reflecting the gravity of the decision and the importance of collective judicial scrutiny before a capital sentence is finalised.
-
Question 30 of 40
Under Section 338, the power to tender a pardon under Section 337, in a case triable exclusively by (or committed to) the Court of Session or High Court, belongs to:
ExplanationSection 338 channels the more serious pardon-tender power (for cases within Sessions/High Court jurisdiction) to the trying Court itself, distinguishing it from a Magistrate's more limited tender power under Section 337 in lesser cases.
-
Question 31 of 40
Under Section 342(2), an accused who refuses to answer questions, or gives false answers, during his examination under this section is:
ExplanationSection 342(2) protects the accused from punishment for either staying silent or answering falsely during this examination — reinforcing that it exists to give him a fair chance to explain himself, not to trap him into a fresh offence.
-
Question 32 of 40
Under Section 342, the Court's examination of the accused (to explain circumstances appearing in evidence against him) is conducted:
ExplanationSection 342 examination is not sworn testimony and is not subject to prosecution cross-examination — its purpose is to give the accused a fair opportunity to explain incriminating evidence, not to generate fresh evidence against him. Pakistani courts have held omitting this examination can vitiate a trial entirely.
-
Question 33 of 40
Under Section 367, a judgment must contain the point or points for determination, the decision on them, and:
ExplanationSection 367 requires a reasoned judgment — not merely a bare verdict — stating the points for determination, the Court's decision, and the reasoning behind it.
-
Question 34 of 40
Under Section 344, if from the absence of a witness or other reasonable cause it is necessary to postpone an inquiry or trial, the Court may, if it thinks fit, remand the accused, and no remand under this section may exceed:
ExplanationSection 344 governs mid-trial remands for postponement/adjournment (distinct from Section 167's pre-cognizance investigation remand), with courts generally holding that individual remand periods should not ordinarily exceed fifteen days, and that indefinite or repeated adjournments without genuine cause are impermissible.
-
Question 35 of 40
Under Section 382, execution of a capital sentence on a woman found to be pregnant must be:
ExplanationSection 382 provides a humanitarian safeguard: postponement of a pregnant woman's death sentence, with the possibility of commutation to life imprisonment.
-
Question 36 of 40
Under Section 376, in confirmation proceedings, the High Court has the power to:
ExplanationSection 376 gives the High Court very broad powers in confirmation proceedings — going well beyond a simple yes/no on the death sentence, extending to acquittal, retrial, or substituting a different conviction altogether.
-
Question 37 of 40
What is the status of the original Chapter XXIII (Sections 266 to 336), which once governed trials before the High Court and Court of Session generally?
ExplanationLike Chapter XVIII (Sections 206-220), Chapter XXIII's Sections 266-336 have been entirely omitted from the current Code — this entire numeric range was superseded by Chapter XXII-A's Sections 265-A through 265-N, which now govern trials before the High Court and Court of Session on a police report.
-
Question 38 of 40
Pakistani case law distinguishes a 'judgment' from other court orders by holding that:
ExplanationPakistani courts have clarified that not every order in a criminal matter is a 'judgment' — the term specifically refers to a final decision terminating in conviction or acquittal; an order of discharge, for instance, is not itself a judgment.
-
Question 39 of 40
Under Section 350, when a Presiding Officer is changed partway through a trial (e.g., due to transfer), the successor Judge:
ExplanationSection 350 allows continuity despite a change in the presiding officer, letting the successor rely on evidence already recorded (subject to safeguards), avoiding the waste of a full restart in every case of judicial transfer or reassignment.
-
Question 40 of 40
Under the illustration to Section 403, if 'A' is tried and convicted for causing grievous hurt to 'B', and 'B' later dies from that injury, 'A':
ExplanationThis is the Code's own illustrative example clarifying that Section 403's bar does not apply where a materially new consequence (the victim's death) gives rise to a genuinely distinct offence not fully litigated in the first trial.
0 / 40 answered
You can practise as a guest, but sign in to save your score and track your progress.